Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351246›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2024

Field Cancerization Therapies for the Management of Actinic Keratosis: An Updated Review.

Ishita Aggarwal, Carolina Puyana, Neha Chandan, Nathan Jetter, Maria Tsoukas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ishita AggarwalDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St., Suite 380, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Carolina PuyanaDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St., Suite 380, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Neha ChandanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St., Suite 380, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Nathan JetterDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St., Suite 380, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Maria TsoukasDepartment of Dermatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, 808 S. Wood St., Suite 380, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. tsoukasm@uic.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-8571
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field cancerization theory highlights that the skin surrounding actinic keratoses (AK) is also at increased risk for possible malignant transformation; thus, field-directed treatments may both reduce the risk of AK recurrence and potentially reduce the risk of development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with either aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methylaminolevulinate (MAL), as well as topical treatments such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), diclofenac gel, piroxicam, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate, have all shown higher efficacy than vehicle treatments. PDT is widely recognized for its high efficacy; however, concerns for associated pain have driven new studies to begin using alternative illumination and pretreatment techniques, including lasers. Among topical treatments, a combination of 5-FU and salicylic acid (5-FU-SA) has shown to be the most effective but also causes the most adverse reactions. Tirbanibulin, a new topical agent approved for use in 2020, boasts a favorable safety profile in comparison with imiquimod, 5-FU, and diclofenac. Meanwhile, ingenol mebutate is no longer recommended for the treatment of AKs due to concerns for increased risk of cSCC development. Moving forward, an increasing number of studies push for standardization of outcome measures to better predict risk of future cSCC and use of more effective measures of cost to better guide patients. Here, we present an updated and comprehensive narrative review both confirming the efficacy of previously mentioned therapies as well as highlighting new approaches to PDT and discussing the use of lasers and novel topical treatments for treatment of AK.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellKeratosis, ActinicPhotochemotherapySkin NeoplasmsAdministration, CutaneousAntineoplastic AgentsCell Transformation, NeoplasticHumansLaser TherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID38351246
OpenAlexW4391799671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.