ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2024
Field Cancerization Therapies for the Management of Actinic Keratosis: An Updated Review.
Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment for Actinic Keratosis at 1-Year Follow-Up: A Real-Life Extension Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Clinical and Histopathological Assessment of the Field of Cancerization in Human Skin Before and After Treatment With a 1927-nm Thulium Fractional Laser.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Observational
- Indoor Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Actinic Keratosis of the Scalp: Intrapatient Comparison Study of 1 h versus 2 h Exposure Time.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Dermatology: A Review with Emphasis on Skin Cancer Management and Prevention.Cancers · 2025Review
- Real-World Efficacy of Tirbanibulin in Actinic Keratosis Treatment: Expert Consensus and Clinical Insights.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
- Epidemiology and Management of Actinic Keratosis in France: A General Population Survey (REAKT).Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Observational
- Beneficial effects of proanthocyanidins on skin aging: a review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Molecular Biomarkers in Cutaneous Photodynamic Therapy: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Vascular Characteristics of Treatment-resistant and -responsive Actinic Keratosis Identified with Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Increased CD56 expression after photodynamic therapy indicates an increased natural killer cell count following early photodynamic therapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Anti-aging Effects of Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment: A Real-Life Experience.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Field cancerization theory highlights that the skin surrounding actinic keratoses (AK) is also at increased risk for possible malignant transformation; thus, field-directed treatments may both reduce the risk of AK recurrence and potentially reduce the risk of development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with either aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methylaminolevulinate (MAL), as well as topical treatments such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), diclofenac gel, piroxicam, imiquimod, and ingenol mebutate, have all shown higher efficacy than vehicle treatments. PDT is widely recognized for its high efficacy; however, concerns for associated pain have driven new studies to begin using alternative illumination and pretreatment techniques, including lasers. Among topical treatments, a combination of 5-FU and salicylic acid (5-FU-SA) has shown to be the most effective but also causes the most adverse reactions. Tirbanibulin, a new topical agent approved for use in 2020, boasts a favorable safety profile in comparison with imiquimod, 5-FU, and diclofenac. Meanwhile, ingenol mebutate is no longer recommended for the treatment of AKs due to concerns for increased risk of cSCC development. Moving forward, an increasing number of studies push for standardization of outcome measures to better predict risk of future cSCC and use of more effective measures of cost to better guide patients. Here, we present an updated and comprehensive narrative review both confirming the efficacy of previously mentioned therapies as well as highlighting new approaches to PDT and discussing the use of lasers and novel topical treatments for treatment of AK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.