Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351132›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Real-Time Assessment of Rodent Engagement Using ArUco Markers: A Scalable and Accessible Approach for Scoring Behavior in a Nose-Poking Go/No-Go Task.

Thomas J Smith, Trevor R Smith, Fareeha Faruk, Mihai Bendea, Shreya Tirumala Kumara, Jeffrey R Capadona, Ana G Hernandez-Reynoso, Joseph J Pancrazio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Tailtag: A multi-mouse tracking system to measure social dynamics in complex environments.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J SmithSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4047-246X
Trevor R SmithDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506.
Fareeha FarukSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080.
Mihai BendeaSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080.
Shreya Tirumala KumaraDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080.
Jeffrey R CapadonaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106.
Ana G Hernandez-ReynosoDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080.
Joseph J PancrazioDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080 joseph.pancrazio@utdallas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8276-3690
The University of Texas at Dallas · USWest Virginia University · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Characterizing and Mitigating the Role of Oxidative Damage in Microelectrode FailureR01NS110823 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPADONA, JEFFREY R, PANCRAZIO, JOSEPH J. · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of behavioral neuroscience, the classification and scoring of animal behavior play pivotal roles in the quantification and interpretation of complex behaviors displayed by animals. Traditional methods have relied on video examination by investigators, which is labor-intensive and susceptible to bias. To address these challenges, research efforts have focused on computational methods and image-processing algorithms for automated behavioral classification. Two primary approaches have emerged: marker- and markerless-based tracking systems. In this study, we showcase the utility of "Augmented Reality University of Cordoba" (ArUco) markers as a marker-based tracking approach for assessing rat engagement during a nose-poking go/no-go behavioral task. In addition, we introduce a two-state engagement model based on ArUco marker tracking data that can be analyzed with a rectangular kernel convolution to identify critical transition points between states of engagement and distraction. In this study, we hypothesized that ArUco markers could be utilized to accurately estimate animal engagement in a nose-poking go/no-go behavioral task, enabling the computation of optimal task durations for behavioral testing. Here, we present the performance of our ArUco tracking program, demonstrating a classification accuracy of 98% that was validated against the manual curation of video data. Furthermore, our convolution analysis revealed that, on average, our animals became disengaged with the behavioral task at ∼75 min, providing a quantitative basis for limiting experimental session durations. Overall, our approach offers a scalable, efficient, and accessible solution for automated scoring of rodent engagement during behavioral data collection.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalRodentiaAlgorithmsAnimalsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedRatsArUco markersautomated scoringcomputer visionengagement analysisgo/no-goreal-time tracking

Identifiers

PMID38351132
PMCPMC11046262
OpenAlexW4391773599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.