Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351107›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Bayesian evaluation of diverging theories of episodic and affective memory distortions in dysphoria.

Sascha B Duken, Liza Keessen, Herbert Hoijtink, Merel Kindt, Vanessa A van Ast

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sascha B DukenDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. sascha_duken@web.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6380-7651
Liza KeessenAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Herbert HoijtinkDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8509-1973
Merel KindtDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7989-3195
Vanessa A van AstDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. v.a.vanAst@uva.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-2799
University of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 406.17.564Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 451.16.021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People suffering from dysphoria retrieve autobiographical memories distorted in content and affect, which may contribute to the aetiology and maintenance of depression. However, key memory difficulties in dysphoria remain elusive because theories disagree how memories of different valence are altered. Here, we assessed the psychophysiological expression of affect and retrieved episodic detail while participants with dysphoria (but without a diagnosed mental illness) and participants without dysphoria relived positive, negative, and neutral memories. We show that participants with dysphoria retrieve positive memories with diminished episodic detail and negative memories with enhanced detail, compared to participants without dysphoria. This is in line with negativity bias but not overgeneral memory bias theories. According to confirmatory analyses, participants with dysphoria also express diminished positive affect and enhanced negative affect when retrieving happy memories, but exploratory analyses suggest that this increase in negative affect may not be robust. Further confirmatory analyses showed that affective responses to memories are not related to episodic detail and already present during the experience of new emotional events. Our results indicate that affective memory distortions may not emerge from mnemonic processes but from general distortions in positive affect, which challenges assumptions of memory theories and therapeutics. Protocol registration: The Stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on the 18

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMemory, EpisodicBayes TheoremEmotionsHappinessHumansMemory DisordersMental Recall

Identifiers

PMID38351107
PMCPMC10864297
OpenAlexW4391778852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.