Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351093›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2024

Global cross-sectional survey on neonatal pharmacologic sedation and analgesia practices and pain assessment tools: impact of the sociodemographic index (SDI).

Cristina Arribas, Giacomo Cavallaro, Juan-Luis Gonzalez, Carolina Lagares, Genny Raffaeli, Anne Smits, Sinno H P Simons, Eduardo Villamor, Karel Allegaert, Felipe Garrido and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Midazolam for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Cristina ArribasDepartment of Pediatrics, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta, 1, Madrid, 28027, Spain.
Giacomo CavallaroNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122, Milan, Italy. giacomo.cavallaro@policlinico.mi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-1437
Juan-Luis GonzalezDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cadiz, 11003, Cádiz, Spain.
Carolina LagaresDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cadiz, 11003, Cádiz, Spain.
Genny RaffaeliNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Anne SmitsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sinno H P SimonsDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Erasmus University Medical Center-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eduardo VillamorMosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC + ), School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht University, 6202AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Karel AllegaertDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Felipe GarridoDepartment of Pediatrics, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta, 1, Madrid, 28027, Spain.
ESPR Special Interest Group for Neonatal Pain

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health—Current Research IRCCS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is variability in the use of sedatives and analgesics in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). We aimed to investigate the use of analgesics and sedatives and the management of neonatal pain and distress.

methodsThis was a global, prospective, cross-sectional study. A survey was distributed May-November 2022. The primary outcome of this research was to compare results between countries depending on their socio-sanitary level using the sociodemographic index (SDI). We organized results based on geographical location.

resultsThe survey collected 1304 responses, but we analyzed 924 responses after database cleaning. Responses from 98 different countries were analyzed. More than 60% of NICUs reported having an analgosedation guideline, and one-third of respondents used neonatal pain scales in more than 80% of neonates. We found differences in the management of sedation and analgesia between NICUs on different continents, but especially between countries with different SDIs. Countries with a higher SDI had greater availability of and adherence to analgosedation guidelines, as well as higher rates of analgosedation for painful or distressing procedures. Countries with different SDIs reported differences in analgosedation for neonatal intubation, invasive ventilation, and therapeutic hypothermia, among others.

conclusionsSocio-economic status of countries impacts on neonatal analgosedation management. IMPACT: There is significant variability in the pain management practices in neonates. There is a lack of knowledge related to how neonatal pain management practices differ between regions. Sociodemographic index is a key factor associated with differences in neonatal pain management practices across global regions.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnalgesicsHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalPain ManagementPain MeasurementCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePainProspective StudiesSociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesicsHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.