Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351054›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024

Production and use of rapid responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec (Canada): perspectives from evidence synthesis producers and decision makers.

Esther McSween-Cadieux, Julie Lane, Quan Nha Hong, Andrée-Anne Houle, François Lauzier-Jobin, Eliane Saint-Pierre Mousset, Ollivier Prigent, Saliha Ziam, Thomas Poder, Alain Lesage and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Influence of non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 interventions on speed-related and alcohol-related traffic injuries in five cities of the province of Québec, Canada.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Esther McSween-CadieuxDepartment of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada. esther.mc.sween-cadieux@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-0035
Julie LaneDepartment of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Quan Nha HongSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Andrée-Anne HouleCentre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
François Lauzier-JobinCentre RBC d'expertise Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Eliane Saint-Pierre MoussetDepartment of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Ollivier PrigentDepartment of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Saliha ZiamSchool of Business Administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montreal, Canada.
Thomas PoderCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), CIUSSS-de-l'Est-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Alain LesageCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM), CIUSSS-de-l'Est-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Pierre DagenaisDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
Université de Sherbrooke · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité TÉLUQ · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has required evidence to be made available more rapidly than usual, in order to meet the needs of decision makers in a timely manner. These exceptional circumstances have caused significant challenges for organizations and teams responsible for evidence synthesis. They had to adapt to provide rapid responses to support decision-making. This study aimed to document (1) the challenges and adaptations made to produce rapid responses during the pandemic, (2) their perceived usefulness, reported use and factors influencing their use and (3) the methodological adaptations made to produce rapid responses.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted in 2021 with eight organizations in the health and social services system in Quebec (Canada), including three institutes with a provincial mandate. Data collection included focus groups (n = 9 groups in 8 organizations with 64 participants), interviews with decision makers (n = 12), and a document analysis of COVID-19 rapid responses (n = 128). A thematic analysis of qualitative data (objectives 1 and 2) and a descriptive analysis of documents (objective 3) were conducted.

resultsThe results highlight the teams and organizations' agility to deal with the many challenges encountered during the pandemic (e.g., increased their workloads, adoption of new technological tools or work processes, improved collaboration, development of scientific monitoring, adaptation of evidence synthesis methodologies and products). The challenge of balancing rigor and speed was reported by teams and organizations. When available at the right time, rapid responses have been reported as a useful tool for informing or justifying decisions in a context of uncertainty. Several factors that may influence their use were identified (e.g., clearly identify needs, interactions with producers, perceived rigor and credibility, precise and feasible recommendations). Certain trends in the methodological approaches used to speed up the evidence synthesis process were identified.

conclusionsThis study documented rapid responses producers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Quebec, and decision makers who requested, consulted, or used these products. Potential areas of improvements are identified such as reinforce coordination, improve communication loops, clarify guidelines or methodological benchmarks, and enhance utility of rapid response products for decision makers.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCanadaDecision MakingHumansQuebecCanadaCOVID-19Evidence-informed decision-makingEvidence usePandemicQuebecRapid evidence synthesisRapid responses

Identifiers

PMID38351054
PMCPMC10863098
OpenAlexW4391785731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.