Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automatic enhancement preprocessing for segmentation of low quality cell images.

Sota Kato, Kazuhiro Hotta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sota KatoDepartment of Electrical, Information, Materials and Materials Engineering, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Meijo University, Shiogamaguchi, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 468-8502, Japan. 150442030@ccalumni.meijo-u.ac.jp.
Kazuhiro HottaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Meijo University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a novel automatic preprocessing and ensemble learning technique for the segmentation of low-quality cell images. Capturing cells subjected to intense light is challenging due to their vulnerability to light-induced cell death. Consequently, microscopic cell images tend to be of low quality and it causes low accuracy for semantic segmentation. This problem can not be satisfactorily solved by classical image preprocessing methods. Therefore, we propose a novel approach of automatic enhancement preprocessing (AEP), which translates an input image into images that are easy to recognize by deep learning. AEP is composed of two deep neural networks, and the penultimate feature maps of the first network are employed as filters to translate an input image with low quality into images that are easily classified by deep learning. Additionally, we propose an automatic weighted ensemble learning (AWEL), which combines the multiple segmentation results. Since the second network predicts segmentation results corresponding to each translated input image, multiple segmentation results can be aggregated by automatically determining suitable weights. Experiments on two types of cell image segmentation confirmed that AEP can translate low-quality cell images into images that are easy to segment and that segmentation accuracy improves using AWEL.

Indexed as

Biological PhenomenaImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCell DeathNeural Networks, ComputerSemantics

Identifiers

PMID38351053
PMCPMC10864346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.