Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351032›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2024

Changing the liver transplant assessment process from inpatient to a day-case and outpatient approach to reduce inpatient bed utlisation.

Peter Robinson Smith, Annette Richardson, Louise Macdougall, Ellice Cross, Siobhan Davison, Vanessa Knowles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter Robinson SmithNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Annette RichardsonNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK annette.richardson4@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1694-0454
Louise MacdougallNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Ellice CrossNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Siobhan DavisonNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Vanessa KnowlesNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The liver transplant assessment process involves a complex set of tests and clinical reviews to determine suitability for liver transplantation. We had an assessment process involving a 3-day inpatient stay and often experienced difficulties admitting patients to the prebooked bed due to a lack of inpatient bed availability.We aimed to change the process from a 3-day and 2-night inpatient stay to a 1-day day-case stay to reduce the demand for inpatient beds.Planning the new assessment process involved negotiations with many department staff to establish prebooked timeslots in 1 day. The improvement project was tested and refined through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. The liver transplant assessment team used their established once-a-week meeting to learn what went well and to agree on revisions to the process for further testing. The process involved several adaptations, such as the removal and changing of individual time slots, reinforcement of early notification once patients had finished their tests and scheduling a separate outpatient appointment to provide time for junior doctor clerking and blood tests.The new day-case and outpatient coordinated liver transplant assessment process resulted in a reduction of inpatient hospital bed utilisation from an average of 257-20 inpatient bed days per annum. This reduction in inpatient bed utilisation was maintained for 3 years with a similar level of patient satisfaction. The cost avoidance was calculated at £381.96 per patient, which is a 63% reduction in cost. Assuming an average number of patients being assessed per annum of 110, this would result in an average cost avoidance of £42 016 per annum. The carbon footprint was calculated with an average reduction per patient from 618 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kgCO

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationHospitalizationHumansInpatientsOutpatientsPatient SatisfactionCost-Benefit AnalysisHealthcare quality improvementPatient satisfactionTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID38351032
PMCPMC10868252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.