Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38351019›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Immigrant women's and families' views and experiences of routine postnatal care: findings from a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Emma Sacks, Vanessa Brizuela, Dena Javadi, Yoona Kim, Nika Elmi, Kenneth Finlayson, Nicola Crossland, Etienne V Langlois, Daniela Ziegler, Seema Menon Parmar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Emma Sacks *Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA esacks@jhu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-7208
Vanessa Brizuela *UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-0828
Dena JavadiDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yoona KimDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Nika ElmiSchool of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth FinlaysonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Nicola CrosslandSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Etienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-2511
Daniela ZieglerCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Seema Menon ParmarCleveland Clinic Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mercedes BonetUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9015-1635
World Health Organization · CHJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Lancashire · GBCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAHarvard University · USMcMaster University · CA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUptake of postnatal care (PNC) is low and inequitable in many countries, and immigrant women may experience additional challenges to access and effective use. As part of a larger study examining the views of women, partners, and families on routine PNC, we analysed a subset of data on the specific experiences of immigrant women and families.

methodsThis is a subanalysis of a larger qualitative evidence synthesis. We searched MEDLINE, PUBMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EBM-Reviews and grey literature for studies published until December 2019 with extractable qualitative data with no language restrictions. For this analysis, we focused on papers related to immigrant women and families. Two reviewers screened each study independently; inclusion was agreed by consensus. Data abstraction and quality assessment were carried out using a study-specific extraction form and established quality assessment tools. Study findings were identified using thematic analysis. Findings are presented by confidence in the finding, applying the GRADE-CERQual approach.

findingsWe included 44 papers, out of 602 full-texts, representing 11 countries where women and families sought PNC after immigrating. All but one included immigrants to high-income countries. Four themes were identified: resources and access, differences from home country, support needs, and experiences of care. High confidence study findings included: language and communication challenges; uncertainty about navigating system supports including transportation; high mental health, emotional, and informational needs; the impact of personal resources and social support; and the quality of interaction with healthcare providers. These findings highlight the importance of care experiences beyond clinical care. More research is also needed on the experiences of families migrating between low-income countries.

conclusionsImmigrant families experience many challenges in getting routine PNC, especially related to language, culture, and communication. Some challenges may be mitigated by improving comprehensive and accessible information on available services, as well as holistic social support. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019139183.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsPostnatal CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPregnancySocial SupportMaternal healthPublic HealthQualitative studySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38351019
PMCPMC10897958
OpenAlexW4391819366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.