ArticleHealth research policy and systems2024
Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Key Components and Barriers in Web-Based Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training: Systematic Narrative Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Creating shared vision in patient partnered research: a case example of patient engagement from the PAVE project (producing an arthritis value framework with economic evidence: paving the way for rare childhood disease).Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Facilitators and barriers to patient and public involvement in developing learning health systems within community health services: ascoping review.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Review
- Review
- Understanding strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to organizational-level family engagement in two childhood-onset disability research organizations.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Co-creating discovery in basic science: Challenges and opportunities in patient-partnered research for rare liver disease.Canadian liver journal · 2026Article
- Building capacity for patient-engagement in neuromuscular disease research: A network project.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Barriers and solutions for healthcare professionals to involve patients as partners in oncology research: Project RISE.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Assessing patient engagement approaches in the development of patient reported outcome measures.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Operationalizing Trauma-Informed Principles to Build Safe, Inclusive, and Equitable Patient Partnerships in Pediatric Pain Research.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Developing and applying the 'Participatory Research to Action Framework' for meaningful engagement of experts-by-experience in applied health services research: a case study approach.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Mixed identity is an identity: embracing the people involved in research partnerships.BMJ open · 2025Review
- Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- A Training Program to Support Patient Engagement in Primary Health Care Research: Co-Design, Implementation, and Evaluation Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Partnering for impact: best practices for planning in-person academic events with Patient Partners involvement- Lessons learned from Diabetes Action Canada.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Learning to work together: experiences of researchers and family partners in a patient-oriented research team.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Patient partner engagement in the publication process: challenges and possible solutions.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Review
- Assessing the context within academic health institutions toward improving equity-based, community and patient-engaged research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient engagement in research (also commonly referred to as patient or patient and public involvement in research) strives to transform health research wherein patients (including caregivers and the public) are regularly and actively engaged as multidisciplinary research team members (i.e. patient partners) working jointly towards improved health outcomes and an enhanced healthcare system. To support its mindful evolution into a staple of health research, this participatory study aimed to identify future directions for Canadian patient engagement in research and discusses its findings in the context of the international literature.
methodsThe study met its aim through a multi-meeting pan-Canadian virtual workshop. Participants (n = 30) included Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research-funded academic researchers and patient partners identified through a publicly available database, personal and professional networks and social media. All spoke English, could access the workshop virtually, and provided written informed consent. The workshop was composed of four, 1.5-3-h virtual meetings wherein participants discussed the current and preferred future states of Canadian patient engagement in research. Workshop discussions (i.e. data) were video and audio recorded. Themes were generated through an iterative process of inductive thematic analysis that occurred concurrently with the multi-week workshop.
resultsOur participatory and iterative process identified 10 targetable areas of focus for the future of Canadian patient engagement in research. Five were categorized as system-level (systemic integration; academic culture; engagement networks; funding models; compensation models), one as researcher-level (engagement processes), and four crossed both levels (awareness; diversity and recruitment; training, tools and education; evaluation and impact). System level targetable areas called for reshaping the patient engagement ecosystem to create a legitimized and supportive space for patient engagement to be a staple component of a learning health system. Researcher level targetable areas called for academic researchers and patient partners to collaboratively generate evidence and apply knowledge to inform values and behaviours necessary to foster and sustain supportive health research spaces that are accessible to all.
conclusionsFuture directions for Canadian patient engagement in research span 10 interconnected targetable areas that require strong leadership and joint action between patient partners, academic researchers, and health and research institutions if patient engagement is to become a ubiquitous component of a learning health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.