ArticleBMC oral health2024
A graftless maxillary sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement: a prospective clinical study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07424742 (Transcrestal Graftless Schneiderian Membrane Elevation by Self-tapping Dental Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transcrestal Graftless Schneiderian Membrane Elevation by Self-tapping Dental Implant
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence of sinus membrane perforation in transcrestal graftless maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of autologous platelet concentrates as solely grafting material or with bone graft materials in maxillary sinus augmentation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review.Clinical implant dentistry and related research · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of concentrated growth factors with or without grafting materials in maxillary sinus augmentation: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical, radiographic and histomorphometry evaluation of the osteogenic potential of Schneiderian membrane after graftless maxillary sinus augmentation: a randomized controlled clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Graft-Free Sinus Lift Using a Resorbable Magnesium Membrane vs. Standard Grafting Protocol: A Bilateral Case Report with Histological Evaluation.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Spontaneous bone formation after sinus graft infection control: a case report and review of the literature.BMC oral health · 2026Review
- Effect of implant protrusion length on intrasinus bone formation in transalveolar sinus lift without grafting: a meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of peri-implant tissue health and patient reported outcome measures in indirect sinus floor augmentation in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of osseodensification and crestal approach sinus kit for transcrestal sinus elevation - A randomized clinical trial.Dental research journal · 2025Article
- Anatomical Possibilities of the Alveolar Bone at the Upper Second Premolar Level.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- [Graftless maxillary sinus lift with simultaneous implant placement: a case report].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to introduce a graftless sinus lifting approach with simultaneous dental implant placement in the alveolus of the posterior maxilla and compare this approach's outcomes in freshly extracted sockets versus healed sockets. MATERIALS AND
methodsA prospective study was conducted on 60 patients aged between 27 and 59 years old, requiring dental implants in the posterior maxilla, and diagnosed with reduced vertical bone height (30 with freshly extracted sockets (group A) and the remaining 30 with healed sockets (group B). Before the sinus lifting approach, a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken, followed by another CBCT at least one-year post-sinus lifting (range: 12-36 months). Biological and mechanical complications were assessed, and the primary implant stability was measured using the Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). Parametric data were analyzed using an independent t-test for intergroup comparisons, with significance set at P < 0.05.
resultsNo significant differences were found among groups concerning gender, placement side, and follow-up. All dental implants demonstrated high survival rates with no observed biological or mechanical complications. Moreover, the primary implant stability was satisfactory, and there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.38). In terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both groups exhibited satisfactory and successful outcomes, with increased new bone formation in group A. However, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.26). Regarding the vertical sinus floor elevation without new bone formation, group B showed (0.11 ± 0.64) mm of intrasinus implant height without bone formation, while group A showed an increment of bone formation above the intrasinus implant (0.22 ± 0.33) mm, with no statistically significant difference between both groups (P = 0.30).
conclusionOur approach proves to be predictable, low-cost, and efficient option for sinus lift procedures, demonstrating high survival rates with acceptable primary implant stability. Moreover, it yields satisfactory outcomes in terms of new intrasinus bone formation, both in freshly extracted and healed sockets. Consequently, our approach holds promise as a reliable procedure for sinus lifting with simultaneous dental implant placement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.