ArticleInternational dental journal2024
The Role of Pecking Motion Depths in Dynamic Cyclic Fatigue Resistance: In Vitro Study.
Article in International dental journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical and elemental comparison of EndoStar and One Curve nickel-titanium endodontic files: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Thermal Treatment Prevents Effects of Downward Loads on the Screw-In Force Generation and Canal-Centering Ability of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Novel Replica-Like Instruments in Static Test Model.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis is the first study evaluating the impact of different pecking motion depths on dynamic cyclic fatigue resistance of different endodontic instruments.
methodsFour nickel-titanium systems (Hyflex EDM OneFile 25/. ∼; Rotate 25/0.6; Mtwo 25/0.6; Reciproc Blue R25) were tested. Forty instruments from each group were subjected to 4 different pecking movements to evaluate their cyclic fatigue resistance. The distances for the pecking motion were 3-mm forward and backward, 1-mm (3-mm forward and 2-mm backward), 2-mm (4-mm forward and 2-mm backward), and 3-mm (5-mm forward and 2-mm backward). Speeds were 100 and 200 mm/min for the descending and ascending motion, respectively. The times to fracture (TtF) in seconds were recorded for each instrument. Data were statistically analysed by using 2-way ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison post hoc test (P < .05).
resultsAll instruments had a significant increase in cyclic fatigue resistance during the forward dynamic motion compared with the axial continuous. Overall, the heat-treated instruments reported higher fatigue strength than the untreated files (P < .05). Reciproc Blue and Hyflex EDM showed higher TtF in the forward movements of 1-/2-mm and 2-mm (P < .05), respectively while Mtwo 25.06 and Rotate 25.06 in the forward movement of 3-mm (P < .05).
conclusionsWithin the limits of this in vitro study, the pecking motion depths had varying impacts on the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments. Reciproc Blue and Hyflex EDM performed significantly better with pecking motions of 1-and 2-mm. Improving endodontic instrument durability through specific pecking depths has the potential for improving clinical performance and reducing instrument failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.