Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38350651›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2024

Systemic Cisplatin Does Not Affect the Bone Regeneration Process in a Critical Size Defect Murine Model.

Ava A Brozovich, Stefania Lenna, Carson Benner, Stefano Serpelloni, Francesca Paradiso, Patrick McCulloch, Jason T Yustein, Bradley Weiner, Francesca Taraballi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ava A BrozovichDepartment of Orthopedics, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Stefania LennaCenter for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Carson BennerDepartment of Orthopedics, Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
Stefano SerpelloniCenter for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Francesca ParadisoCenter for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Patrick McCullochHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Jason T YusteinAflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States.
Bradley WeinerCenter for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.
Francesca TaraballiCenter for Musculoskeletal Regeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4959-1169
Houston Methodist · USEmory University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor, and the current standard of care for OS includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by an R0 surgical resection of the primary tumor, and then postsurgical adjuvant chemotherapy. Bone reconstruction following OS resection is particularly challenging due to the size of the bone voids and because patients are treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy, which theoretically could impact bone formation. We hypothesized that an osteogenic material could be used in order to induce bone regeneration when adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is given. We utilized a biomimetic, biodegradable magnesium-doped hydroxyapatite/type I collagen composite material (MHA/Coll) to promote bone regeneration in the presence of systemic chemotherapy in a murine critical size defect model. We found that in the presence of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, MHA/Coll is able to enhance and increase bone formation in a murine critical size defect model (11.16 ± 2.55 or 13.80 ± 3.18 versus 8.70 ± 0.81 mm

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcomaAnimalsBone RegenerationCisplatinDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceCisplatinbiomimetic materialsbone regenerationmineralized materialsosteosarcomasegmental defect

Identifiers

PMID38350651
PMCPMC10936525
OpenAlexW4391815540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.