ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2024
Consequences of changing planned foot placement on balance control and forward progress.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Consequences of changing planned foot placement on balance control and forward progress.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While walking humans generally plan foot placement two steps in advance. However, it is often necessary to rapidly alter foot placement position just before stepping due to the appearance of a new obstacle. While humans are quite capable of rapidly altering foot placement position, such changes can have major effects on centre of mass dynamics. We investigated how rapid changes to planned foot placement impact centre of mass dynamics, and how such changes influence the control of balance and forward progress, during both straight- and turning-gait. Thirteen young adults walked along a virtually projected walkway with precision footholds oriented either in a straight line or with a single 60°, 90° or 120° turn. On a subset of trials, participants were required to rapidly avoid stepping on select footholds. We found that if the centre of mass was disrupted such that it interfered with task success (i.e. staying upright and continuing along the planned path), walkers were more likely to sacrifice forward progress than the upright stability. Further, walkers appear to control centre of mass dynamics differently following inhibited steps during step turns than during spin turns, which may reflect a larger threat to task success when spin turns are interrupted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.