ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2024
A transformer-based diffusion probabilistic model for heart rate and blood pressure forecasting in Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online Sepsis Prediction Using Vital Signs and Multiscale Temporal-Aware Contrastive Learning: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Synthetic artificial intelligence in cardiology: from generative models to clinical applications.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Transformer-based deep learning model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension using dynamic time-series vital signs: A retrospective study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Data-Centric AI for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: Noise Filtering and Augmentation Strategies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Large language models forecast patient health trajectories enabling digital twins.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in cardiovascular specialty care: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Applications of generative artificial intelligence in outcome prediction in intensive care medicine-a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveVital sign monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is crucial for enabling prompt interventions for patients. This underscores the need for an accurate predictive system. Therefore, this study proposes a novel deep learning approach for forecasting Heart Rate (HR), Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) in the ICU.
methodsWe extracted 24,886 ICU stays from the MIMIC-III database which contains data from over 46 thousand patients, to train and test the model. The model proposed in this study, Transformer-based Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Sparse Time Series Forecasting (TDSTF), merges Transformer and diffusion models to forecast vital signs. The TDSTF model showed state-of-the-art performance in predicting vital signs in the ICU, outperforming other models' ability to predict distributions of vital signs and being more computationally efficient. The code is available at https://github.com/PingChang818/TDSTF.
resultsThe results of the study showed that TDSTF achieved a Standardized Average Continuous Ranked Probability Score (SACRPS) of 0.4438 and a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 0.4168, an improvement of 18.9% and 34.3% over the best baseline model, respectively. The inference speed of TDSTF is more than 17 times faster than the best baseline model.
conclusionTDSTF is an effective and efficient solution for forecasting vital signs in the ICU, and it shows a significant improvement compared to other models in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.