Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38350038›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association2024

Unilateral Spatial Neglect May Not Be Detected by Performance-Based Functional Neglect Assessment.

Emily S Grattan, Brice Hounshel Smith, Katie Mullen, Michelle L Woodbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily S GrattanEmily S. Grattan, PhD, OTR/L, is Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; esg39@pitt.edu. At the time this research was completed, Grattan was also Research Health Scientist, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Brice Hounshel SmithBrice Hounshel Smith, BS, is Research Assistant and Doctor of Occupational Therapy Student, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Katie MullenKatie Mullen, MOT, OTR/L, is Research Occupational Therapist and Doctor of Clinical Science in Occupational Therapy Student, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Michelle L WoodburyMichelle L. Woodbury, PhD, OTR/L, is Professor, Department of Health Sciences and Research and Division of Occupational Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Funding

South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Treating Depression and Enhancing Locomotor Recovery Post-strokeP20GM109040 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI KAUTZ, STEVEN A. · 2014 to 2024
$23.5M
Improving Measurement and Treatment of Post-stroke NeglectIK2RX002420 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI GRATTAN, EMILY · 2018 to 2023
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109040RRD VA IK2 RX002420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceUnilateral spatial neglect (neglect) poststroke is disabling. It is critical that people with neglect are identified so that treatment can be provided to maximize independence. However, there is some evidence to suggest that existing assessments may not adequately measure neglect. It is unclear whether assessments also fail to identify people with neglect entirely.

objectiveTo determine whether there are stroke survivors who self-report neglect symptoms that are not detected by therapist-rated assessments and to compare self-report and therapist-ratings.

designCross-sectional study.

settingU.S. university research center.

participantsUnilateral stroke survivors (N = 133).

interventionNot applicable. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) was administered to participants and scored by a trained occupational therapist. The parallel self-evaluation anosognosia form was also administered to participants to self-report and rate neglect symptoms.

resultsForty-eight participants (36.1%) were classified as without neglect on the basis of therapist-rated total CBS scores, yet 30 (62.5%) of these 48 participants reported symptoms of neglect on the CBS self-evaluation anosognosia form. There was a significant difference (p < .001) between therapist-rated and self-rated total CBS scores. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results indicate that many stroke survivors report some level of disability associated with neglect yet do not meet the criteria to be classified as having neglect according to a commonly used therapist-rated performance-based measure. Plain-Language Summary: The findings of this study contribute to the evidence that existing assessments used by occupational therapists to measure performance-based neglect may not always detect neglect symptoms comprehensively in people poststroke. The finding also suggest that we may be missing neglect symptoms entirely. Occupational therapists should consider using various methods to assess for neglect, including patient self-report and comprehensive occupational profiles. Clinicians should also thoroughly screen all clients with stroke for neglect, regardless of lesion location.

Indexed as

AgnosiaPerceptual DisordersStrokeStroke RehabilitationCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID38350038
PMCPMC11017738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.