Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38350027›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

(Non)targeted Chemical Analysis and Risk Assessment of Organic Contaminants in Darkibor Kale Grown at Rural and Urban Farms.

Christopher L Brueck, Xiaoyue Xin, Sara N Lupolt, Brent F Kim, Raychel E Santo, Qinfan Lyu, Antony J Williams, Keeve E Nachman, Carsten Prasse

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher L BrueckDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2310-1114
Xiaoyue XinDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Sara N LupoltDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6263-5333
Brent F KimDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Raychel E SantoDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Qinfan LyuDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Antony J WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-4821
Keeve E NachmanDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.
Carsten PrasseDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1470-141X
Johns Hopkins University · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the presence and human hazards associated with pesticides and other anthropogenic chemicals identified in kale grown in urban and rural environments. Pesticides and related compounds (i.e., surfactants and metabolites) in kale samples were evaluated using a nontargeted data acquisition for targeted analysis method which utilized a pesticide mixture containing >1,000 compounds for suspect screening and quantification. We modeled population-level exposures and assessed noncancer hazards to DEET, piperonyl butoxide, prometon, secbumeton, terbumeton, and spinosyn A using nationally representative estimates of kale consumption across life stages in the US. Our findings indicate even sensitive populations (e.g., pregnant women and children) are not likely to experience hazards from these select compounds were they to consume kale from this study. However, a strictly nontargeted chemical analytical approach identified a total of 1,822 features across all samples, and principal component analysis revealed that the kale chemical composition may have been impacted by agricultural growing practices and environmental factors. Confidence level 2 compounds that were ≥5 times more abundant in the urban samples than in rural samples (p < 0.05) included chemicals categorized as "flavoring and nutrients" and "surfactants" in the EPA's Chemicals and Products Database. Using the US-EPA's Cheminformatics Hazard Module, we identified that many of the nontarget compounds have predicted toxicity scores of "very high" for several end points related to human health. These aspects would have been overlooked using traditional targeted analysis methods, although more information is needed to ascertain whether the compounds identified through nontargeted analysis are of environmental or human health concern. As such, our approach enabled the identification of potentially hazardous compounds that, based on their hazard assessment score, merit follow-up investigations.

Indexed as

BrassicaPesticidesChildFarmsFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentPesticidescomplex mixturesexposure assessmentfood contaminantshigh-resolution mass spectrometryin silico toolspesticidesQuEChERS

Identifiers

PMID38350027
PMCPMC11293618
OpenAlexW4391771732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.