ArticlePloS one2024
Unleashing the behavioral factors affecting the decision making of Chinese investors in stock markets.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling the Nexus: Influence of learning motivation on organizational performance and innovative climate of Chinese firms.PloS one · 2024Article
- Retraction: Unleashing the behavioral factors affecting the decision making of Chinese investors in stock markets.PloS one · 2024Article
- Role of social media to improve job performance with mediating role of transactive memory capability and employee creativity.PloS one · 2024Article
- Unveiling the economic potential of sports industry in China: A data driven analysis.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-11-11Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Unreliable Data · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research paper delves into the behavioral factors that have impact on decision making of Chinese investors in stock markets. As one of the world's most dynamic and rapidly evolving financial landscapes, stock markets of China have witnessed significant growth and transformation in recent years. However, the role of behavioral biases in shaping investment decisions remains a relatively understudied aspect. Drawing upon a detailed review of studies, psychological theories, and empirical studies, this research explores various behavioral factors affecting the decision of investors at Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets. Through a structured questionnaire and by collecting a sample of 521 respondents, this paper investigates that herding, overconfidence, prospect, market, gamble's fallacy, and anchoring-ability bias often lead investors to deviate from rational decision-making and contribute to market inefficiencies. While herding, prospect, and heuristic affect the investment performance in stock markets of China. Moreover, the research underscores the need for investor education programs and regulatory interventions that acknowledge the presence of behavioral biases and encourage more informed decision-making. By shedding light on these dynamics, it provides valuable insights for policymakers, financial institutions, and investors seeking to navigate the intricacies of this rapidly growing financial landscape.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.