Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349934›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

The type IV pilus chemoreceptor PilJ controls chemotaxis of one bacterial species towards another.

Kaitlin D Yarrington, Tyler N Shendruk, Dominique H Limoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct roles of PilI and ChpC inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mBio · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaitlin D YarringtonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-2760
Tyler N ShendrukSchool of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Dominique H LimoliDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4130-337X
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Decoding interspecies signaling networks and the biogeography of polymicrobial infectionsR35GM142760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LIMOLI, DOMINIQUE · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria live in social communities, where the ability to sense and respond to interspecies and environmental signals is critical for survival. We previously showed the pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa detects secreted peptides from bacterial competitors and navigates through interspecies signal gradients using pilus-based motility. Yet, it was unknown whether P. aeruginosa utilizes a designated chemosensory system for this behavior. Here, we performed a systematic genetic analysis of a putative pilus chemosensory system, followed by high-speed live-imaging and single-cell tracking, to reveal behaviors of mutants that retain motility but are blind to interspecies signals. The enzymes predicted to methylate (PilK) and demethylate (ChpB) the putative pilus chemoreceptor, PilJ, are necessary for cells to control the direction of migration. While these findings implicate PilJ as a bona fide chemoreceptor, such function had yet to be experimentally defined, as full-length PilJ is essential for motility. Thus, we constructed systematic genetic modifications of PilJ and found that without the predicted ligand binding domains or predicted methylation sites, cells lose the ability to detect competitor gradients, despite retaining pilus-mediated motility. Chemotaxis trajectory analysis revealed that increased probability and size of P. aeruginosa pilus-mediated steps towards S. aureus peptides, versus steps away, determines motility bias in wild type cells. However, PilJ mutants blind to interspecies signals take less frequent steps towards S. aureus or steps of equal size towards and away. Collectively, this work uncovers the chemosensory nature of PilJ, provides insight into how cell movements are biased during pilus-based chemotaxis, and identifies chemotactic interactions necessary for bacterial survival in polymicrobial communities, revealing putative pathways where therapeutic intervention might disrupt bacterial communication.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisStaphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsCell MovementFimbriae, BacterialPeptidesPseudomonas aeruginosaBacterial ProteinsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID38349934
PMCPMC10896506
OpenAlexW4391773638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.