Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349902›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Ethical issues in direct-to-consumer healthcare: A scoping review.

Ashwini Nagappan, Louiza Kalokairinou, Anna Wexler

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Use of Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Thoughts, Perspectives and Experiences of Australian Adults.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashwini NagappanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-102X
Louiza KalokairinouDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5787-6535
Anna WexlerDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-9038

Funding

Technology Identification and Training CoreP30AG073105 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KARLAWISH, JASON H · 2021 to 2025
$21.2M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
Do-it-Yourself and Direct-to-Consumer Medicine and Science: Assessing the Public Health Issues and Regulatory GapsDP5OD026420 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEXLER, ANNA · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000046NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883NIA NIH HHS P30 AG073105NIH HHS DP5 OD026420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing number of health products and services are being offered on a direct-to-consumer (DTC) basis. To date, however, scholarship on DTC healthcare products and services has largely proceeded in a domain-specific fashion, with discussions of relevant ethical challenges occurring within specific medical specialties. The present study therefore aimed to provide a scoping review of ethical issues raised in the academic literature across types of DTC healthcare products and services. A systematic search for relevant publications between 2011-2021 was conducted on PubMed and Google Scholar using iteratively developed search terms. The final sample included 86 publications that discussed ethical issues related to DTC healthcare products and services. All publications were coded for ethical issues mentioned, primary DTC product or service discussed, type of study, year of publication, and geographical context. We found that the types of DTC healthcare products and services mentioned in our sample spanned six categories: neurotechnology (34%), testing (20%), in-person services (17%), digital health tools (14%), telemedicine (13%), and physical interventions (2%). Ethical arguments in favor of DTC healthcare included improved access (e.g., financial, geographical; 31%), increased autonomy (29%), and enhanced convenience (16%). Commonly raised ethical concerns included insufficient regulation (72%), questionable efficacy and quality (70%), safety and physical harms (66%), misleading advertising claims (56%), and privacy (34%). Other frequently occurring ethical concerns pertained to financial costs, targeting vulnerable groups, informed consent, and potential burdens on healthcare providers, the healthcare system, and society. Our findings offer insights into the cross-cutting ethical issues associated with DTC healthcare and underscore the need for increased interdisciplinary communication to address the challenges they raise.

Identifiers

PMID38349902
PMCPMC10863864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.