Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349761›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology2024

Understanding New Machine Learning Architectures: Practical Generative Artificial Intelligence for Anesthesiologists.

Christopher W Connor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher W ConnorHarvard Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Departments of Physiology and Biophysics, and Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-641X

Funding

Pan-neuronal functional imaging and anesthesiaR35GM145319 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Christopher W Connor · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
Pan-neuronal functional imaging and anesthesiaR01GM121457 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CONNOR, CHRISTOPHER W · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121457NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM145319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in neural networks have given rise to generative artificial intelligence, systems able to produce fluent responses to natural questions or attractive and even photorealistic images from text prompts. These systems were developed through new network architectures that permit massive computational resources to be applied efficiently to enormous data sets. First, this review examines autoencoder architecture and its derivatives the variational autoencoder and the U-Net in annotating and manipulating images and extracting salience. This architecture will be important for applications like automated x-ray interpretation or real-time highlighting of anatomy in ultrasound images. Second, this article examines the transformer architecture in the interpretation and generation of natural language, as it will be useful in producing automated summarization of medical records or performing initial patient screening. The author also applies the GPT-3.5 algorithm to example questions from the American Board of Anesthesiologists Basic Examination and find that, under surprisingly reasonable conditions, it correctly answers more than half the questions.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsArtificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38349761
PMCPMC10868863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.