Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349598›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2024

Development of a culturally targeted chatbot to inform living kidney donor candidates of African ancestry about APOL1 genetic testing: a mixed methods study.

Elisa J Gordon, Jessica Gacki-Smith, Matthew J Gooden, Preeya Waite, Rochell Yacat, Zenab R Abubakari, Debra Duquette, Akansha Agrawal, John Friedewald, Sarah K Savage and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contextual factors of implementing APOL1 genetic testing into living kidney donor clinical evaluation.Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Brief Review of Artificial Intelligence in Living Kidney Donation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Elisa J GordonDepartment of Surgery, Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161 21St Avenue South, D-4314 Medical Center North Nashville, Nashville, TN, 37232-2730, USA. elisa.gordon@vumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-1998
Jessica Gacki-SmithCenter for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7000-9014
Matthew J GoodenCenter for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8430-3265
Preeya WaiteCenter for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4119-131X
Rochell YacatMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-6182
Zenab R AbubakariMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-7397
Debra DuquetteMedicine, Cardiology Division, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4664-0495
Akansha AgrawalDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2662-7023
John FriedewaldDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-9928
Sarah K SavageInvitae Corporation, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-1044
Matthew CooperFroedtert Hospital Center for Advanced Care, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-9638
Alexander GilbertMedstar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Lutfiyya N MuhammadDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8655-1484
Catherine WicklundDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-2872

Funding

Integrating a culturally competent APOL1 genetic testing program into living donor evaluationR01DK128207 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI AGRAWAL, AKANSHA, FRIEDEWALD, JOHN J · 2021 to 2025
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128207NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK128207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical chatbots are increasingly used to help integrate genetic testing into clinical contexts, but no chatbot exists for Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) genetic testing of living kidney donor (LKD) candidates of African ancestry. Our study aimed to culturally adapt and assess perceptions of the Gia® chatbot to help integrate APOL1 testing into LKD evaluation. Ten focus groups and post-focus group surveys were conducted with 54 LKDs, community members, and kidney transplant recipients of African ancestry. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Key themes about making Gia culturally targeted included ensuring: (1) transparency by providing Black LKDs' testimonials, explaining patient privacy and confidentiality protections, and explaining how genetic testing can help LKD evaluation; (2) content is informative by educating Black LKDs about APOL1 testing instead of aiming to convince them to undergo testing, presenting statistics, and describing how genetic discrimination is legally prevented; and (3) content avoids stigma about living donation in the Black community. Most agreed Gia was neutral and unbiased (82%), trustworthy (82%), and words, phrases, and expressions were familiar to the intended audience (85%). Our culturally adapted APOL1 Gia chatbot was well regarded. Future research should assess how this chatbot could supplement provider discussion prior to genetic testing to scale APOL1 counseling and testing for LKD candidate clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

AdaptationAfrican AmericanBlackCommunity engagementDigital health technologiesEquityEvaluationFocus groupsGenetic counselingInformed consentNephrologyPatient-centeredScalingTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID38349598
PMCPMC11031529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.