Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349590›Full record

SynthesisPharmacoEconomics2024

Exploring the Use of Pictorial Approaches in the Development of Paediatric Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments: A Systematic Review.

Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa, Norma B Bulamu, Lauren Lines, Gang Chen, David G T Whitehurst, Kim Dalziel, Nancy Devlin, Julie Ratcliffe, Quality of Life in Kids: Key Evidence for Decision Makers in Australia (QUOKKA) project team

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Qualitative insights from patient/caregivers, and clinicians on routine use of the EQ-5D-Y-5L in clinical paediatric care-results from a pilot feasibility and acceptability trial.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Trial
  3. Outcomes from a STEM Education Program for Elementary School Students in Medically Underserved Areas and Populations.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christine Mpundu-KaambwaHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia. christine.mpundu-kaambwa@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-6068
Norma B BulamuFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4822-4858
Lauren LinesHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-6960
Gang ChenCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8385-5965
David G T WhitehurstFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7890-6756
Kim DalzielMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-8871
Nancy DevlinHealth Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-5361
Julie RatcliffeHealth and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-1988
Quality of Life in Kids: Key Evidence for Decision Makers in Australia (QUOKKA) project team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChildren may find self-reporting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) presented in text-based formats difficult, particularly younger children and children with developmental delays or chronic illness. In such cases, pictorial PROMs (where pictorial representations are used alongside or to replace text) may offer a valid alternative.

aimThis systematic literature review focused on identifying and describing paediatric PROMs that incorporate pictorial approaches, providing children with more effective means to express their HRQoL.

methodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to 1 March 2022. There were no country restrictions applied to the search; all English-language studies were considered for inclusion in the review. Characteristics and development methods of the identified pictorial PROMs were evaluated against context-specific good practice guidelines published by The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR).

resultsA total of 22 paediatric pictorial PROMs, comprising 28 unique versions, were identified. These PROMs were predominantly developed in the USA and the UK, targeting children aged 3-18 years. Likert scales with pictorial anchors, particularly happy-sad faces, were commonly used for response options, appearing in 15 (54%) of the PROMs. Various graphic methods, such as happy-sad faces, cartoons, and thermometers, were adapted to specific content domains. These PROMs covered a wide range of domains, including physical and emotional health and social functioning. Emphasis was placed on content validity, including active child participation in developing pictorial elements. Notably, children's participation was sought during the development of the pictorial elements for 13 (46%) of the PROMs. Various development methods were employed, with 43% of paediatric PROMs using literature reviews, 43% using focus groups, and 32% involving expert consultation. Interviews emerged as the primary method, being employed in 61% of the studies. Additionally, three measures specifically addressed cross-cultural considerations.

conclusionPaediatric pictorial PROMs offer child-friendly tools for assessing HRQoL for application with children who find reading and understanding text-based PROMs challenging. There is some evidence that pictorial PROMs facilitate self-report in this population and improve measurement properties compared to text-only PROMs. Further research is needed to develop, validate, and test paediatric pictorial PROMs, with an emphasis on including children from the inception in the co-design process.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansSelf Report

Identifiers

PMID38349590
PMCPMC11168995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.