Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349539›Full record

ArticleBasic research in cardiology2024

Distinct cytoskeletal regulators of mechanical memory in cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes.

Nesrine Bouhrira, Alexia Vite, Kenneth B Margulies

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanical regulation of cell memory.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nesrine BouhriraPerelman School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Smilow TRC 11-101, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6406-2302
Alexia VitePerelman School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Smilow TRC 11-101, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Kenneth B MarguliesPerelman School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Smilow TRC 11-101, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. kenb@upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8093-4465
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechanical Stress-Dependent Remodeling of the Cardiac Microtubule NetworkR01HL149891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Kenneth Ber Margulies, Benjamin Lears Prosser · 2020 to 2026
$4.2M
AHA POSTDOCTORAL fellowship 1030560Fondation Leducq 673168NHLBI Division of Intramural Research R01-HL149891-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing that cells "feel" and respond to their mechanical environment, recent studies demonstrate that many cells exhibit a phenomenon of "mechanical memory" in which features induced by prior mechanical cues persist after the mechanical stimulus has ceased. While there is a general recognition that different cell types exhibit different responses to changes in extracellular matrix stiffening, the phenomenon of mechanical memory within myocardial cell types has received little attention to date. To probe the dynamics of mechanical memory in cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) and cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs), we employed a magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) cell culture substrate with tunable and reversible stiffness spanning the range from normal to diseased myocardium. In CFs, using increased cell area and increases in α-smooth muscle actin as markers of cellular responses to matrix stiffening, we found that induction of mechanical memory required seven days of stiff priming. Both induction and maintenance of persistent CF activation were blocked with the F-actin inhibitor cytochalasin D, while inhibitors of microtubule detyrosination had no impact on CFs. In iPSC-CMs, mechanical memory was invoked after only 24 h of stiff priming. Moreover, mechanical memory induction and maintenance were microtubule-dependent in CMs with no dependence on F-actin. Overall, these results identify the distinct temporal dynamics of mechanical memory in CFs and iPSC-CMs with different cytoskeletal mediators responsible for inducing and maintaining the stiffness-activated phenotype. Due to its flexibility, this model is broadly applicable to future studies interrogating mechanotransduction and mechanical memory in the heart and might inform strategies for attenuating the impact of load-induced pathology and excess myocardial stiffness.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsMyocytes, CardiacActinsCell DifferentiationFibroblastsHumansMechanotransduction, CellularActinsCytoskeletonF-actinMechanical memoryMechanotransductionMicrotubulesSubstrate stiffness

Identifiers

PMID38349539
OpenAlexW4391781251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.