ArticleBasic research in cardiology2024
Distinct cytoskeletal regulators of mechanical memory in cardiac fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes.
Article in Basic research in cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanical regulation of cell memory.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026Review
- From force to fate: Implications of mechanomemory in lung disease.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- T-tubular remodeling occurs in a cardiomyocyte-autonomous manner following pathological mechanical stiffness exposure.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2026Article
- Viscoelasticity of the Heart: An Overview of Viscoelastic Measurements at Different Scales.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Review
- Extracellular matrix stiffness conditions glioblastoma cells for long-term migration: Mechanical memory as a driver of invasion and recurrence in glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2026Review
- Mechanical memory in cells: mechanisms, effects, and applications in regenerative medicine.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Signals from the extracellular matrix: Region- and sex-specificity in cardiac aging.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025Review
- Cellular mechanical memory: a potential tool for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Mechanical Forces, Nucleus, Chromosomes, and Chromatin.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recognizing that cells "feel" and respond to their mechanical environment, recent studies demonstrate that many cells exhibit a phenomenon of "mechanical memory" in which features induced by prior mechanical cues persist after the mechanical stimulus has ceased. While there is a general recognition that different cell types exhibit different responses to changes in extracellular matrix stiffening, the phenomenon of mechanical memory within myocardial cell types has received little attention to date. To probe the dynamics of mechanical memory in cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) and cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-CMs), we employed a magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) cell culture substrate with tunable and reversible stiffness spanning the range from normal to diseased myocardium. In CFs, using increased cell area and increases in α-smooth muscle actin as markers of cellular responses to matrix stiffening, we found that induction of mechanical memory required seven days of stiff priming. Both induction and maintenance of persistent CF activation were blocked with the F-actin inhibitor cytochalasin D, while inhibitors of microtubule detyrosination had no impact on CFs. In iPSC-CMs, mechanical memory was invoked after only 24 h of stiff priming. Moreover, mechanical memory induction and maintenance were microtubule-dependent in CMs with no dependence on F-actin. Overall, these results identify the distinct temporal dynamics of mechanical memory in CFs and iPSC-CMs with different cytoskeletal mediators responsible for inducing and maintaining the stiffness-activated phenotype. Due to its flexibility, this model is broadly applicable to future studies interrogating mechanotransduction and mechanical memory in the heart and might inform strategies for attenuating the impact of load-induced pathology and excess myocardial stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.