Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38349501›Full record

ReviewCVIR endovascular2024

Primary and secondary postpartum haemorrhage: a review for a rationale endovascular approach.

Alberto Alonso-Burgos, Ignacio Díaz-Lorenzo, Laura Muñoz-Saá, Guillermo Gallardo, Teresa Castellanos, Regina Cardenas, Luis Chiva de Agustín

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Imaging in the postpartum period.European journal of radiology open · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Alonso-BurgosRadiology Department, Vascular Surgery and Interventional Radiology Unit, University Clinic of Navarra, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain. alonsoburgosmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-7670
Ignacio Díaz-LorenzoRadiology Department, Interventional Radiology Unit, University Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4895-9689
Laura Muñoz-SaáGynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2572-2168
Guillermo GallardoRadiology Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-3544
Teresa CastellanosGynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-1154
Regina CardenasGynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5052-4568
Luis Chiva de AgustínGynaecology and Obstetrics, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-3251
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a significant cause of maternal mortality globally, necessitating prompt and efficient management. This review provides a comprehensive exploration of endovascular treatment dimensions for both primary and secondary PPH, with a focus on uterine atony, trauma, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), and retained products of conception (RPOC). Primary PPH, occurring within 24 h, often results from uterine atony in 70% of causes, but also from trauma, or PAS. Uterine atony involves inadequate myometrial contraction, addressed through uterine massage, oxytocin, and, if needed, mechanical modalities like balloon tamponade. Trauma-related PPH may stem from perineal injuries or pseudoaneurysm rupture, while PAS involves abnormal placental adherence. PAS demands early detection due to associated life-threatening bleeding during delivery. Secondary PPH, occurring within 24 h to 6 weeks postpartum, frequently arises from RPOC. Medical management may include uterine contraction drugs and hemostatic agents, but invasive procedures like dilation and curettage (D&C) or hysteroscopic resection may be required.Imaging assessments, particularly through ultrasound (US), play a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment planning of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), except for uterine atony, where imaging techniques prove to be of limited utility in its management. Computed tomography play an important role in evaluation of trauma related PPH cases and MRI is essential in diagnosing and treatment planning of PAS and RPOC.Uterine artery embolization (UAE) has become a standard intervention for refractory PPH, offering a rapid, effective, and safe alternative to surgery with a success rate exceeding 85% (Rand T. et al. CVIR Endovasc 3:1-12, 2020). The technical approach involves non-selective uterine artery embolization with resorbable gelatine sponge (GS) in semi-liquid or torpedo presentation as the most extended embolic or calibrated microspheres. Selective embolization is warranted in cases with identifiable bleeding points or RPOC with AVM-like angiographic patterns and liquid embolics could be a good option in this scenario. UAE in PAS requires a tailored approach, considering the degree of placental invasion. A thorough understanding of female pelvis vascular anatomy and collateral pathways is essential for accurate and safe UAE.In conclusion, integrating interventional radiology techniques into clinical guidelines for primary and secondary PPH management and co-working during labour is crucial.

Indexed as

EmbolizationPlacenta acretaPostpartum haemorrhageRetained products conceptionUterus atony

Identifiers

PMID38349501
PMCPMC10864234
OpenAlexW4391781325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.