ArticleJournal of computational neuroscience2024
Ion-concentration gradients induced by synaptic input increase the voltage depolarization in dendritic spines.
Article in Journal of computational neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemically Selective Nanoelectrode Arrays for Real-Time, Parallel Neurotransmitter and Electrical Recording.Small science · 2026Article
- How do signals propagate in neuronal compartments? Insights from the Poisson-Nernst Planck model.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The vast majority of excitatory synaptic connections occur on dendritic spines. Due to their extremely small volume and spatial segregation from the dendrite, even moderate synaptic currents can significantly alter ionic concentrations. This results in chemical potential gradients between the dendrite and the spine head, leading to measurable electrical currents. In modeling electric signals in spines, different formalisms were previously used. While the cable equation is fundamental for understanding the electrical potential along dendrites, it only considers electrical currents as a result of gradients in electrical potential. The Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations offer a more accurate description for spines by incorporating both electrical and chemical potential. However, solving PNP equations is computationally complex. In this work, diffusion currents are incorporated into the cable equation, leveraging an analogy between chemical and electrical potential. For simulating electric signals based on this extension of the cable equation, a straightforward numerical solver is introduced. The study demonstrates that this set of equations can be accurately solved using an explicit finite difference scheme. Through numerical simulations, this study unveils a previously unrecognized mechanism involving diffusion currents that amplify electric signals in spines. This discovery holds crucial implications for both numerical simulations and experimental studies focused on spine neck resistance and calcium signaling in dendritic spines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.