Trial reportIndian journal of pediatrics2025
Comparison of Telemedicine versus In-Person Visit for Control of Asthma in Children aged 7-17 years: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Telemedicine on Asthma Control and Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare asthma control between telemedicine and in-person visit in children aged 7 to 17 y.
methodsA non-inferiority randomized-controlled trial was conducted at a pediatric chest clinic, involving a total of 192 patients, with 96 children in each group of telemedicine and in-person follow-up.
resultsThere was a significant improvement in the mean asthma control test (ACT)/ Childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) scores from baseline to three months in both groups, with no significant difference in the change of means between the two groups. The mean difference in ACT/C-ACT score at three months in the telemedicine and in-person visit group was -0.35; 95% CI (-1.30 to +0.10) [p-value 0.09]. There was a significant change in the mean Pediatric Quality of Life index (PQLI) scores from 57.2 ± 10.2 to 66.82 ± 7.99 in the telemedicine group and from 56.1 ± 11.7 to 66.71 ± 4.66 in the in-person visit group, however the mean difference in PQLI score in both the groups was not significant (p = 0.91). There was no significant difference in the number of asthma exacerbations (4 vs. 1) between telemedicine and in-person visit (p = 0.10). The mean telemedicine satisfaction questionnaire score in this study was 3.8 ± 0.7, which indicates that most of the parents were satisfied with the telemedicine follow-up process.
conclusionsThis study revealed that telemedicine is non-inferior to in-person visit for follow-up of children with asthma and can be used as an alternative to in-person visit for the management of asthma, especially in remote settings and pandemic situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.