SynthesisLa Radiologia medica2024
Application of magnetic resonance imaging radiomics in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in La Radiologia medica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Why Radiomics Rarely Reaches the Clinic: Reproducibility, Validation, and Evidence Gap-A Critical Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Research trends and emerging themes of magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial cancer: a bibliometric analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Prediction of tumor grade in endometrioid carcinoma using a deep learning radiomics model from ultrasound images: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Updated ESUR Guidelines for Endometrial Cancer: integrating MRI with the 2023 FIGO Staging Revolution.European radiology · 2026Review
- Multimodal ultrasound radiomics containing microflow images for the prediction of central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Value of MRI for Pelvic Lymph Node Extracapsular Invasion in Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Exploratory Analysis of Radiomics and Pathomics in Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic utility of apparent diffusion coefficient in preoperative assessment of endometrial cancer: are we ready for the 2023 FIGO staging?BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- An Update of AI and Radiomics in Precision Oncology: Insights from Liver Tumors as Case Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to systematically assess the methodological quality and clinical potential application of published magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics studies about endometrial cancer (EC).
methodsStudies of EC radiomics analyses published between 1 January 2000 and 19 March 2023 were extracted, and their methodological quality was evaluated using the radiomics quality score (RQS) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2). Pairwise correlation analyses and separate meta-analyses of studies exploring differential diagnoses and risk prediction were also performed.
resultsForty-five studies involving 3 aims were included. The mean RQS was 13.77 (range: 9-22.5); publication bias was observed in the areas of 'index test' and 'flow and timing'. A high RQS was significantly associated with therapy selection-aimed studies, low QUADAS-2 risk, recent publication year, and high-performance metrics. Raw data from 6 differential diagnosis and 34 risk prediction models were subjected to meta-analysis, revealing diagnostic odds ratios of 23.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.48-66.83) and 18.23 (95% CI 13.68-24.29), respectively.
conclusionThe methodological quality of radiomics studies involving patients with EC is unsatisfactory. However, MRI-based radiomics analyses showed promising utility in terms of differential diagnosis and risk prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38349417What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.