ArticleClinical advances in periodontics2024
Digital assessment of supracrestal tissue attachment and its correlation with dentogingival components.
Article in Clinical advances in periodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Volumetric analysis of root coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: Case study.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2026Article
- Fixed Prosthetic Restorations and Periodontal Health: From Fabrication to Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Preservation and Clinical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Article
- Digital Analysis of Dentogingival Factors Influencing the Gingival Margin Position in the Esthetic Zone.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025Article
- A Novel Framework for Optimizing Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in Subcrestally Placed Implants in Single Molar Cases: Integrating Transitional and Subcrestal Zones for Biological Stability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical-oriented 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of gingival thickness using convolutional neural networks and CBCT.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2025Article
- Digital assessment of supracrestal tissue attachment and its correlation with dentogingival components.Clinical advances in periodontics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to measure, in vivo, the supracrestal tissue attachment dimensions (STADs) by means of a noninvasive digital method and to investigate the association between STADs and gingival thickness (GT), tooth position, tooth length, tooth width, keratinized tissue width (KTW), buccal bone thickness (BBT), and bone crest (BC) level.
methodsNineteen periodontally healthy subjects who previously received full mouth periodontal charting, cone beam computed tomography, and intraoral scan for the purpose of implant planning were included in the study. A digital imaging software was used for the superimposition of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine and stereolithography files, along with hard and soft tissue measurements. Pearson's correlation and ANOVA statistical analyses were used to investigate potential trends between STADs and other dentogingival components.
resultsA total of 203 teeth were assessed, with an average STADs of 2.05 mm (±0.99 mm). STADs were larger in mandibular than maxillary teeth (p-value <0.001) and decreased from anterior to posterior teeth. STADs exhibited an inverse relationship with BBTs and GTs (p-value <0.001) and the KTW (p-value = 0.05). Positive correlations were found between GT and BBT (p-value <0.001), whereas both were negatively correlated with the distance between the cementoenamel junction and BC (p-values 0.019 and 0.006, respectively) and positively correlated with KTW (p-value <0.001).
conclusionsThis study highlighted the dynamic nature of STA relative to tooth position. Additionally, it explored the intricate relationships of STADs with various dentogingival components. KEY POINTS: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study represents the first application of CBCTs, intraoral scans, and clinical probe depths for noninvasive supracrestal tissue attachment measurements. This study advocates for a personalized assessment of supracrestal attachments, incorporating tooth position and other dentogingival components. The study emphasizes the importance for practitioners to consider the specific patient gingival phenotypes during restorative or surgical planning to avoid adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.