ArticleHuman brain mapping2024
How do tasks impact the reliability of fMRI functional connectivity?
Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Servo Navigation and Phase Equalization Enhanced by Run-Time Stabilization (PEERS) for 3D EPI Time Series.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Associations between transdiagnostic dimensions of psychopathology and brain structure and function in youth: What have we learned from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study?Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing functional connectivity scanning conditions for predicting autistic traits.Nature. Mental health · 2026Article
- Age- and Sex-Specific Patterns in Adult Brain Network Segregation.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Time-varying synergy/redundancy dominance in the human cerebral cortex.Journal of physics. Complexity · 2025Article
- How much is "enough"? Considerations for functional connectivity reliability in pediatric naturalistic fMRI.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Brain connectivity correlates of breathing and cardiac patterns in epilepsy: A study including SUDEP cases.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Efficacy of functional connectome fingerprinting using tangent-space brain networks.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Quantification of brain functional connectivity deviations in individuals: A scoping review of functional MRI studies.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2025Article
- Reliability of variability and complexity measures for task and task-free BOLD fMRI.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- How do tasks impact the reliability of fMRI functional connectivity?Human brain mapping · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there is growing interest in the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging-functional connectivity (fMRI-FC) for biomarker research, low measurement reliability of conventional acquisitions may limit applications. Factors known to impact FC reliability include scan length, head motion, signal properties, such as temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR), and the acquisition state or task. As tasks impact signal in a region-wise fashion, they likely impact FC reliability differently across the brain, making task an important decision in study design. Here, we use the densely sampled Midnight Scan Club (MSC) dataset, comprising 5 h of rest and 6 h of task fMRI data in 10 healthy adults, to investigate regional effects of tasks on FC reliability. We further considered how BOLD signal properties contributing to tSNR, that is, temporal mean signal (tMean) and temporal standard deviation (tSD), vary across the brain, associate with FC reliability, and are modulated by tasks. We found that, relative to rest, tasks enhanced FC reliability and increased tSD for specific task-engaged regions. However, FC signal variability and reliability is broadly dampened during tasks outside task-engaged regions. From our analyses, we observed signal variability was the strongest driver of FC reliability. Overall, our findings suggest that the choice of task can have an important impact on reliability and should be considered in relation to maximizing reliability in networks of interest as part of study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.