ReviewJournal of children's orthopaedics2024
Effectiveness of the Ponseti method for congenital clubfoot in patients with arthrogryposis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Review in Journal of children's orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of idiopathic clubfoot: an umbrella review and CPAM-LRC consensus: Limb Reconstruction Committee of Orthopedics Branch of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Health Care (CPAM-LRC).Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of the ponseti method in treating neurogenic clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment of Non-idiopathic, Neglected, and Recurrent Clubfoot After Surgery Using the Ponseti Method.Cureus · 2026Article
- Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of arthrogryposis-associated clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method: a retrospective observational study and comprehensive literature review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to address the Ponseti method in arthrogrypotic clubfoot treatment and evaluate the success, complication, and recurrence rates. Method: A systematic review was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases on 9 January 2023, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Success, recurrence, and complication rates were evaluated and analyzed. Risks of bias and the quality of the studies were also evaluated. Results: Five case series, including 53 patients (102 feet), were identified. According to this model, the initial success rate was 91% (95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.96) with Conclusion: Ponseti method is indicated in the initial treatment of arthrogrypotic clubfeet, as it is a minimally invasive method with a high correction rate (91%). However, a high recurrence rate (30%) requires early detection and adequate treatment. Level of evidence: Level III. PROSPERO Protocol: CRD42020210373.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.