Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38348137›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Aortic arch branch-prioritized reconstruction for type A aortic dissection surgery.

Jianfeng Gao, Jie Yan, Yanyu Duan, Junjian Yu, Wentong Li, Zhifang Luo, Wenbo Yu, Dilin Xie, Ziyou Liu, Jianxian Xiong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jianfeng GaoThe First Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Jie YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Nankang District, Ganzhou, China.
Yanyu DuanHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Junjian YuHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Wentong LiHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zhifang LuoHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Wenbo YuThe First Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Dilin XieThe First Clinical Medical College, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Ziyou LiuHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Jianxian XiongHeart Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University · CNGannan Medical University · CNGanzhou People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (STAAD) is a fatal condition requiring urgent surgical intervention. Owing to the complexity of the surgical process, various complications, such as neurological disorders, are common. In this study, we prioritized the reconstruction of aortic arch branches during surgery and investigated the association between prioritizing the branches and the postoperative outcomes of patients with STAAD. Methods: Ninety-seven patients were included in the observational study and underwent total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk technique between January 2018 and June 2021. Of these, 35 patients underwent the branch-priority technique, and 62 patients underwent the classic technique. By analyzing the perioperative outcomes, we compared the differences between the two techniques. Results: The branch priority group had significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and ventilator times and earlier postoperative wake-up times than the classic group. Additionally, the ICU stay time was shorter, with a significant decrease in neurological complications and 24 h drainage in the branch priority group compared to the classic group. Conclusion: The branch priority technique can effectively provide better brain protection, resulting in earlier awakening of patients after surgery, reduced neurological complications, shorter ventilation time and decreased ICU hospitalization time. Therefore, it is recommended for use in aortic dissection surgeries.

Indexed as

branch priorityfrozen elephant trunkStanford type A aortic dissectionsurgerytotal arch replacement

Identifiers

PMID38348137
PMCPMC10859855
OpenAlexW4391144285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.