Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38348019›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric chemistry and physics2024

Significant human health co-benefits of mitigating African emissions.

Christopher D Wells, Matthew Kasoar, Majid Ezzati, Apostolos Voulgarakis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric chemistry and physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher D WellsThe Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Matthew KasoarLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Majid EzzatiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Apostolos VoulgarakisLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209376Wellcome Trust 209376/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Future African aerosol emissions, and therefore air pollution levels and health outcomes, are uncertain and understudied. Understanding the future health impacts of pollutant emissions from this region is crucial. Here, this research gap is addressed by studying the range in the future health impacts of aerosol emissions from Africa in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios, using the UK Earth System Model version 1 (UKESM1), along with human health concentration-response functions. The effects of Africa following a high-pollution aerosol pathway are studied relative to a low-pollution control, with experiments varying aerosol emissions from industry and biomass burning. Using present-day demographics, annual deaths within Africa attributable to ambient particulate matter are estimated to be lower by 150 000 (5th-95th confidence interval of 67 000-234 000) under stronger African aerosol mitigation by 2090, while those attributable to O

Identifiers

PMID38348019
PMCPMC7615628
OpenAlexW4391243655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.