ArticleCureus2024
A Case of Long-Tract Ileocolic Intussusception Secondary to Well-Differentiated Cecal Adenocarcinoma.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intussusception denotes the intricate phenomenon wherein one segment of the bowel undergoes invagination or telescoping into its contiguous distal segment. The ensuing invaginated segment may be propelled forward through peristaltic movements, potentially precipitating bowel obstruction or ischemia, culminating in necrosis of the affected bowel segment. Although the precise etiology of intussusception remains elusive, particularly in cases devoid of an identifiable lead point, dysrhythmic contractions and lymphoid hyperplasia have been implicated in the pathophysiology of this condition. We present the case of an 86-year-old African American female with a past medical history of hypertension and asthma who presented to our emergency room with a seven-day history of worsening abdominal. The pain was described as sharp and intermittent, and it would worsen with every meal or drink. A physical exam demonstrated the right lower quadrant with vague abdominal tenderness, especially below the umbilical region. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a long segment of ileocolic obstructing intussusception in the ascending colon, with a 2.6 cm solid mass serving as a lead point. Swift intervention ensued with an urgent exploratory laparotomy, culminating in a right hemicolectomy to excise the intussuscepted segment of the bowel. The pathological examination identified a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the cecum, categorized as T1N0M0, with all 20 resected lymph nodes yielding negative results. This illustrative case presents a unique insight into a patient with ileocolic obstructing intussusception, caused by a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma acting as the lead point, a relatively uncommon occurrence in adults. Diagnosing intussusception in adults is challenging due to its nonspecific symptoms, which are similar to those of various other gastrointestinal disorders. Therefore, it is crucial for medical providers to be acutely aware of the possibility that adenocarcinoma can trigger obstructing intussusception in various parts of the bowel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.