Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347894›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Community of trauma care partnering with stakeholders to improve injury outcomes: focus group analysis.

Rachel D Appelbaum, Anna Newcomb, Katherine Joseph, Morgan Hennessy, Princess Fortin, Pam J Bixby, Sue Prentiss, Alexandra McConnell-Hill, Rochelle Flayter, Michelle A Price and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel D AppelbaumVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6401-4060
Anna NewcombInova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Katherine JosephAmerican Trauma Society, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Morgan HennessyCedars Sinai, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Princess FortinHealth Alliance for Violence Intervention, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Pam J BixbyNational Trauma Institute, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Sue PrentissAmerican Trauma Society, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Alexandra McConnell-HillUCSF Health, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rochelle FlayterUC Health, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.
Michelle A PriceCoalition for National Trauma Research, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-7956
Rochelle DickerUCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rosemary KozarR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9582-8622
Elliott R HautJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7075-771X
Deborah M SteinR Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3683-3963
American Trauma Society · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCity College of San Francisco · USInova Fairfax Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USNational Coalition for Cancer Survivorship · USNational Trauma Institute · USUniversity of Colorado Health · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Engaging trauma survivors/caregivers results in research findings that are more relevant to patients' needs and priorities. Although their perspectives increase research significance, there is a lack of understanding about how best to incorporate their insights. We aimed to capture stakeholder perspectives to ensure research is meaningful, respectful, and relevant to the injured patient and their caregivers. Methods: A multiphase, inductive exploratory qualitative study was performed, the first phase of which is described here. Virtual focus groups to elicit stakeholder perspectives and preferences were conducted across 19 trauma centers in the USA during 2022. Discussion topics were chosen to identify patients' motivation to join research studies, preferences regarding consent, suggestions for increasing diversity and access, and feelings regarding outcomes, efficacy, and exception from informed consent. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed to identify the range of perspectives expressed and any common themes that emerged. Results: Ten 90-minute focus groups included patients/caregiver (n=21/1) and researchers (n=14). Data analysis identified common themes emerging across groups. The importance of trust and preexisting relationships with the clinical care team were the most common themes across all groups. Conclusion: Our findings reveal common themes in preferences, motivations, and best practices to increase patient/caregiver participation in trauma research. The project's next phases are distribution of a vignette-based survey to establish broad stakeholder consensus; education and dissemination activities to share strategies that increase research engagement and relevance for patients; and the formation of a panel of patients to support future research endeavors. Level of evidence: Level IV.

Indexed as

Healthcare disparitiespatient-centered careResearchsurvivors

Identifiers

PMID38347894
PMCPMC10860118
OpenAlexW4391684662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.