Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347634›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2024

Diffusion of medications for opioid use disorder treatment in jail settings: a convergent mixed methods study of jail staff perspectives.

Pryce S Michener, Elizabeth A Evans, Warren J Ferguson, Peter D Friedmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pryce S MichenerClinical and Population Health Research Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. pryce.michener@umassmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2258-0849
Elizabeth A EvansDepartment of Health Promotion and Policy, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 715 North Pleasant Street, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA.
Warren J FergusonDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA.
Peter D FriedmannDepartment of Medicine, University of MA Chan Medical School-Baystate, 759 Chestnut St, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.

Funding

Massachusetts Justice Cooperative Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) Research CenterUG1DA050067 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI EVANS, ELIZABETH A. · 2019 to 2023
$10.5M
Implementation of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Massachusetts JailsF30DA058525 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Pryce Michener · 2024 to 2026
$104k
NIDA NIH HHS 5UG1DA050067-04NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA058525NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in jails varies by facility and across states. Organizational climate, including staff attitudes toward change and exposure to education, can influence perceptions of innovations like MOUD in jails. Using a mixed methods design, we aimed to understand the association between organizational climate and jail staff perceptions of MOUD.

methodsJail staff (n = 111) who operate MOUD programs in 6 Massachusetts jails completed surveys that included the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) survey. Random effects logistic regression models assessed associations between organizational climate and several outcomes of perceived MOUD efficacy, acceptability, and knowledge, while controlling for covariates. Jail staff (N = 61) participated in qualitative interviews and focus groups focused on organizational climate and knowledge diffusion, which we analyzed using inductive and deductive methods.

resultsThe results indicate that organizational change readiness on the ORIC was associated with positive perceptions of MOUD, and educational resources facilitated MOUD implementation. Greater ORIC was associated with higher perception of methadone as highly acceptable for jail populations (Odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.2 to 4.4), and high knowledge of methadone (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.9), with similar magnitude of effects for buprenorphine. High levels of training for jail staff on methadone and buprenorphine were also associated with higher knowledge of these medications (Methadone: OR 7.2, 95% CI 2.2 to 23.2; Buprenorphine: OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 9.5). Qualitative results point towards the importance of organizational climate and elucidate educational strategies to improve staff perceptions of MOUD.

conclusionResults underscore the importance of organizational climate for successful implementation of jail MOUD programs and provide support for medication-specific educational resources as a facilitator of successful MOUD implementation in jail settings. Findings highlight implementation strategies that may improve jail staff perceptions of MOUD.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansJailsMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadoneBuprenorphineConvergent mixed-methodsImplementationJailMedications for opioid use disorderMethadoneOpioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID38347634
PMCPMC10863078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.