Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347571›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments.

Jing Shen, Hongyan Qi, Ruhuan Mei, Cencen Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virtual Learning in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing ShenDepartment of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310058, Hangzhou, China. shenjingwzy@zju.edu.cn.
Hongyan QiExperimental Teaching Center of Basic Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310058, Hangzhou, China.
Ruhuan MeiExperimental Teaching Center of Basic Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310058, Hangzhou, China.
Cencen SunExperimental Teaching Center of Basic Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310058, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

Zhejiang Province "14th Five-Year" Teaching Reform Research Project jg20220038Zhejiang University School of Medicine High-level Education and Teaching Achievement Award Cultivation Project cgyb20192001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe swift transition to online teaching in medical education has presented the challenge of replicating in-class engagement and interaction essential for active learning. Despite online team-based learning (TBL) offering potential solutions through structured cooperative activities, its efficacy in virtual simulation experiment courses remains scantily researched. This study investigates the effectiveness of online TBL for teaching virtual patient experiments in a basic medical laboratory course and contrasts it with traditional offline teaching in terms of student performance and perceptions.

methodsA comparative analysis involved 179 Year 3 medical students using online TBL, face-to-face TBL (FTF-TBL), and the flipped classroom (FC) approach. The learning outcomes were assessed based on experiment reports, IRAT scores, TRAT scores, and final exam performance. Students' perceptions of both online and in-class TBL methodologies were also surveyed.

resultsBoth online and in-class TBL groups demonstrated comparable academic outcomes and surpassed the FC group in academic performance. Students displayed a marked preference for the TBL format (whether online or in-class), valuing its enhancement of learning interest and practical knowledge application. Nevertheless, refinements in discussion efficiency, platform convenience, and student-instructor interaction were indicated as potential areas of improvement in the online setting.

conclusionsOnline TBL, along with its in-class counterpart, showed superior academic performance and a more positive learning experience compared to the FC group. These findings underscore the potential of online TBL in adapting to modern pedagogical challenges and enriching medical education through virtual simulation experiments.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalStudents, MedicalCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansProblem-Based LearningFace-to-faceFlipped classroomMedical educationOnlineTeam-based learningVirtual simulation experiments

Identifiers

PMID38347571
PMCPMC10863100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.