Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347545›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2024

Covid-19 vaccination: a mixed methods analysis of health system resilience in Latin America.

Estefania Hernandez-Pineda, Ciro-Alberto Amaya, Catalina González-Uribe, Andrea Herrera, Nubia Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Estefania Hernandez-PinedaSchool of Management, Universidad de Los Andes, Calle 21 # 1-20, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia. e.hernandez12@uniandes.edu.co.ORCID 0000-0002-3689-8209
Ciro-Alberto AmayaSchool of Engineering, Universidad de Los Andes, Cra 1 E ste N° 19A - 40, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-1537-1616
Catalina González-UribeSchool of Medicine, Universidad de Los Andes, Carrera 1 No 18 A - 10 42 Bloque Q Piso 8, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3322-5017
Andrea HerreraSchool of Engineering, Universidad de Los Andes, Cra 1 E ste N° 19A - 40, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2898-7161
Nubia VelascoSchool of Management, Universidad de Los Andes, Calle 21 # 1-20, Bogotá, 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-5717-4998

Funding

International Development Research Centre 109582The swedish international development cooperation agency 109582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper discusses the stages of health system resilience (HSR) and the factors underlying differences in HSR during the covid-19 pandemic, especially the vaccination challenge. We studied the relationship between vaccination strategies and macro-context backgrounds in 21 Latin American countries. Our objective was to capture the impact of those aspects in the SR and identify potential improvements for future crises and for vaccination programs in general.

methodsThe study uses mixed-methods research to provide insights into how the countries' backgrounds and vaccination strategies impact the HSR. Particularly, we used explanatory sequential mixed methods, which entails a quantitative-qualitative two-phase sequence. The quantitative phase was conducted using cluster and variance analysis, in which the HSR was measured using as a proxy the covid-19 vaccination outcomes in three cut-offs of reaching 25%, 50%, and 75% of population coverage. This approach allows us to discriminate covid-19 vaccination progress by stages and contrast it to the qualitative stage, in which we performed a country-case analysis of the background conditions and the changes in vaccination strategies that occurred during the corresponding dates.

resultsThe paper provides a rich comparative case analysis of countries, classifying them by early, prompt, and delayed performers. The results show that differences in vaccination performance are due to flexibility in adapting strategies, cooperation, and the ability to design multilevel solutions that consider the needs of various actors in the health ecosystem. These differences vary depending on the vaccination stage, which suggests the importance of acknowledging learning, diffusion, and feedback processes at the regional level.

conclusionsWe identified the importance of societal well-being as an ideal country antecedent for high and sustained levels of performance in covid-19 vaccination. Whereas in other countries where the set-up and beginning phases were rough, the value of the operational decisions and the learning on the move regarding their own and their peers' trajectories were crucial and were reflected in performance improvement. A contribution of this study is that the above-mentioned analysis was done using vaccination coverage cut-off points that allow a performance view that takes into consideration the stages of the vaccination progress and the learning process that goes with it. As well as framing this into the HSR shock cycles that allow to differentiate the stages of resilience on which countries must act.

Indexed as

COVID-19Resilience, PsychologicalCOVID-19 VaccinesEcosystemHumansLatin AmericaPandemicsVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescovid-19 vaccinationHealth system resilienceHealth system shocksMix-methods researchVaccine supply-scheme

Identifiers

PMID38347545
PMCPMC10863163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.