Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347527›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Six dilemmas for stakeholders inherently affecting data sharing during a zoonotic (re-)emerging infectious disease outbreak response.

Martine Y van Roode, Carolina Dos S Ribeiro, Elmoubasher Farag, Mohamed Nour, Aya Moustafa, Minahil Ahmed, George Haringhuizen, Marion P G Koopmans, Linda H M van de Burgwal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martine Y van RoodeDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vanroode@erasmusmc.nl.
Carolina Dos S RibeiroCenter for Infectious Disease Control, The Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Elmoubasher FaragDepartment of Health Protection & Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
Mohamed NourDepartment of Health Protection & Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
Aya MoustafaDepartment of Health Protection & Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
Minahil AhmedDepartment of Health Protection & Communicable Diseases, Ministry of Public Health, Doha, Qatar.
George HaringhuizenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, The Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Marion P G Koopmans *Department of Viroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda H M van de Burgwal *Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VU Amsterdam), Faculty of Science, Athena Institute for Research On Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely access to outbreak related data, particularly in the early events of a spillover, is important to support evidence based control measures in response to outbreaks of zoonotic Emerging Infectious Diseases (EID). Yet, this is impeded by several barriers that need to be understood to promote timely sharing of data. Using the MERS epidemic as a model for a zoonotic EID outbreak, this study sought to provide an in-depth understanding of data sharing practices.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with 25 experts were conducted, along with Focus Group Discussions with 15 additional experts. A root-cause analysis was performed to examine the causal relationships between barriers. Enablers were mapped to the root-cause analysis to understand their influence on the barriers. Finally, root causes were placed in context of core dilemmas identified from the qualitative analysis.

findingsEight barriers to data sharing were identified, related to collaboration, technical preparedness, regulations, and (conflict of) interests, and placed in the context of six dilemmas inherent to the multi-stakeholder collaboration required for a zoonotic outbreak response. Fourteen identified enablers showed the willingness of stakeholders to overcome or circumvent these barriers, but also indicated the inherent trial and error nature of implementing such enablers.

interpretationAddressing the barriers requires solutions that must consider the complexity and interconnectedness of the root causes underlying them, and should consider the distinct scopes and interests of the different stakeholders. Insights provided by this study can be used to encourage data sharing practices for future outbreaks

fundingWellcome Trust and UK Aid; EU-H2020 Societal Challenges (grant agreement no. 643476), Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VI.Veni.201S.044).

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingEpidemicsAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansInformation DisseminationZoonosesData sharingInfectious diseaseOne HealthOutbreak responseZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID38347527
PMCPMC10863217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.