Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347461›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

Efficacy and safety of temozolomide-based regimens in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Erfan Taherifard, Muhammad Bakhtiar, Mahnoor Mahnoor, Rabeea Ahmed, Ludimila Cavalcante, Janie Zhang, Anwaar Saeed

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Dual‑targeted radioligand therapy with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erfan TaherifardDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Muhammad BakhtiarDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mahnoor MahnoorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rabeea AhmedDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ludimila CavalcanteNovant Health Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Janie ZhangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anwaar SaeedDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. saeeda3@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USNovant Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) highlight the potential benefits of temozolomide, an alkylating agent, for these patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the outcome of temozolomide, alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in patients with advanced pNET.

methodsOnline databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for clinical trials that reported the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in patients with advanced pNET. Random-effect model was utilized to estimate pooled rates of outcomes based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, biochemical response, and adverse events (AEs).

resultsA total of 14 studies, providing details of 441 individuals with advanced pNET, were included. The quantitative analyses showed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 41.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, of 32.4%-50.6%), disease control rate (DCR) of 85.3% (95% CI of 74.9%-91.9%), and a more than 50% decrease from baseline chromogranin A levels of 44.9% (95% CI of 31.6%-49.0%). Regarding safety, the results showed that the pooled rates of nonserious AEs and serious AEs were 93.8% (95% CI of 88.3%-96.8%) and 23.7% (95% CI of 12.0%-41.5%), respectively. The main severe AEs encompassed hematological toxicities.

conclusionsIn conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that treatment with temozolomide, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer treatments might be an effective and relatively safe option for patients with advanced locally unresectable and metastatic pNET. However, additional clinical trials are required to further strengthen these findings. This study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023409280).

Indexed as

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsTemozolomideTemozolomideAdverse reactionsDrug-related side effectsNeuroendocrine tumorsPancreatic neoplasmsResponse evaluation criteria in solid tumorsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID38347461
PMCPMC10860315
OpenAlexW4391738616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.