ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
Overcoming the Challenge of Accurate Segmentation of Lung Nodules: A Multi-crop CNN Approach.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Symmetric Encoder-Decoder Network with Enhanced Group-Shuffle Modules for Robust Lung Nodule Detection in CT Scans.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Automated Lesion Segmentation in Medical Imaging via Integration of nnU-Net Optimization and SAM Approach.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2026Article
- A Comparative Evaluation of Zero-Shot Performance of SAM, SAM2, MedSAM, and MedSAM2 Models on Lung Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- A Custom Annotated Dataset for Segmentation of Pulmonary Veins, Arteries, and Airways.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Statistical Analysis of nnU-Net Models for Lung Nodule Segmentation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung nodules are generated based on the growth of small and round- or oval-shaped cells in the lung, which are either cancerous or non-cancerous. Accurate segmentation of these nodules is crucial for early detection and diagnosis of lung cancer. However, lung nodules can have various shapes, sizes, and densities, making their accurate segmentation a difficult task. Moreover, they can be easily confused with other structures in the lung, including blood vessels and airways, further complicating the segmentation process. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a novel multi-crop convolutional neural network (multi-crop CNN) model that utilizes different sized cropped regions of CT scan images for accurate segmentation of lung nodules. The model consists of three modules, namely the feature representation module, boundary refinement module, and segmentation module. The feature representation module captures features from the lung CT scan image using cropped regions of different sizes, while the boundary refinement module combines the boundary maps and feature maps to generate a final feature map for the segmentation process. The segmentation module produces a high-resolution segmentation map that shows improved accuracy in segmenting cancerous lung nodules. The proposed multi-crop CNN model is evaluated on two segmentation datasets namely LUNA 16 and LIDC-IDRI with an accuracy of 98.3% and 98.5%, respectively. The performances are measured in terms of accuracy, recall, precision, dice coefficient, specificity, AUC/ROC, Hausdorff distance, Jaccard index, and average Hausdorff. Overall, the proposed multi-crop CNN model demonstrates the potential to enhance the lung nodule segmentation accuracy, which could lead to earlier detection and diagnosis of lung cancer and ultimately reduce mortality rates associated with the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.