ArticleSpine deformity2024
Spinal axial torque assessment after surgical correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new approach to 3D barycentremetry and mass distribution based on biplanar radiographs.
Article in Spine deformity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBarycentremetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) allows the distribution of masses and their loading of the spine to be studied. In particular, the axial torque on the spine has been studied in AIS, but not after surgical correction. Spinal axial torque was studied in AIS before and after surgery.
methodsAll AIS (Lenke 1 and 3) who underwent posterior spinal fusion surgery at our center in 2019 were included retrospectively. AIS underwent frontal and sagittal biplanar radiographs in the free-standing position before surgery, 4 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up. Their spine and external envelope were reconstructed with validated methods. Spinal axial torque at the apex and the upper and lower end vertebra was calculated. Finally, the preoperative and postoperative values were compared to a previously published reference corridor for asymptomatic subjects.
resultsTwenty-nine patients were included (54 ± 11° Cobb angle, 15 ± 2 years old at surgery). The surgical procedure decreased the Cobb angle by 36° ± 11° and decreased the spinal axial torque at the upper end vertebra by 2.5 N/m (95% CI = [1.9; 3]; p < 0.001), at the apex by 0.6 N/m (95% CI = [0.4; 1]; p = 0.004), at the lower end vertebra by 2 N/m (95% CI = [1.5; 2.8]; p < 0.001). Compared to 95th percentile of torque, which was previously evaluated in asymptomatic subjects, more than 90% of patients had higher values at the upper and lower end vertebrae before surgery. Postoperatively, 62% of patients still had higher torque at the upper end vertebra than asymptomatic subjects, while only 38% patients showed abnormal values at the lower junction.
conclusionResults of this study confirm that AIS patients show abnormally high spinal axial torque, especially at the end vertebrae, and that this parameter is normalized postoperatively for only a small number of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.