Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347344›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024

Meta-lasso: new insight on infection prediction after minimally invasive surgery.

Yuejia Cheng, Qinhua Tang, Xiang Li, Liyan Ma, Junyi Yuan, Xumin Hou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuejia Cheng *Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 241 West Huaihai Road, 200030, Shanghai, China.
Qinhua Tang *Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 241 West Huaihai Road, 200030, Shanghai, China.
Xiang LiSchool of Computer Science, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, 200044, Shanghai, China.
Liyan MaSchool of Computer Science, Shanghai University, 99 Shangda Road, 200044, Shanghai, China.
Junyi YuanShanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 241 West Huaihai Road, 200030, Shanghai, China.
Xumin HouShanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 241 West Huaihai Road, 200030, Shanghai, China. houxumin@shchest.org.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai University · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

Xuhui District Artificial Intelligence Medical Hospital Local Cooperation Project of 2021 2021-010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) after minimally invasive lung cancer surgery constitutes an important factor influencing the direct and indirect economic implications, patient prognosis, and the 5-year survival rate for early-stage lung cancer patients. In the realm of predictive healthcare, machine learning algorithms have been instrumental in anticipating various surgical outcomes, including SSI. However, accurately predicting infection after minimally invasive surgery remains a clinical challenge due to the multitude of physiological and surgical factors associated with it. Furthermore, clinical patient data, in addition to being high-dimensional, often exists the long-tail problem, posing difficulties for traditional machine learning algorithms in effectively processing such data. Based on this insight, we propose a novel approach called meta-lasso for infection prediction following minimally invasive surgery. Our approach leverages the sparse learning algorithm lasso regression to select informative features and introduces a meta-learning framework to mitigate bias towards the dominant class. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients who had undergone minimally invasive surgery for lung cancer at Shanghai Chest Hospital between 2018 and 2020. The evaluation encompassed key performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, precision (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Our approach has surpassed the performance of logistic regression, random forest, Naive Bayes classifier, gradient boosting decision tree, ANN, and lasso regression, with sensitivity at 0.798, specificity at 0.779, precision at 0.789, NPV at 0.798, and accuracy at 0.788 and has greatly improved the classification performance of the inferior class.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsMachine LearningMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Wound InfectionAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesInfection predictionLong-tail problemMachine learningMeta learning

Identifiers

PMID38347344
OpenAlexW4394747242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.