ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Evaluation of disease-specific quality of life and its influencing factors in Bulgarian patients with Graves' orbitopathy.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The burden of thyroid eye disease: Evaluating treatment outcomes on quality of life.European journal of ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable machine learning for severity classification of thyroid eye disease using orbital anatomical features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGraves' orbitopathy (GO) profoundly affects patients' quality of life (QoL). Our aim was to assess QoL in patients with different forms of GO and to search for predictors of QoL.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study involving 221 consecutive unselected GO patients (77.4% females, mean age 52 ± 11.6) referred to our clinic in the period 2017-2021. Detailed medical history was obtained from all patients, followed by hormonal and immunological testing and comprehensive ocular status. QoL was assessed by a disease-specific questionnaire (GO-QoL), consisting of two scales-one related to visual functioning (QoL-VF) and the other-to physical appearance (QoL-AP). The results were calculated by formula and expressed as percentages.
resultsMild GO patients had significantly higher scores on both scales of GO-QoL compared to moderate-to-severe and sight-threatening GO patients (82.0 vs. 54.6% and 27.3% for QoL-VF; 70.1 vs. 54.4% and 36.9% for QoL-AP). Patients with active GO had significantly poorer QoL-VF (56.6 vs. 76.6%) and QoL-AP (53.1 vs. 67.5%) in comparison to patients with inactive GO. The stepwise linear regression analysis showed that the variables with major predictive value for QoL-VF were: CAS, diplopia score, visual acuity and severity of the symptoms (R
conclusionsThe impact of GO on patients' QoL depends on the severity and activity of the disease. The clinical predictors of the impairment of QoL should be taken into account when considering the optimal adjunctive treatment approaches aiming to improve patients' QoL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.