Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347273›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Comparison of the clinical outcomes of VBE-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

Xinbo Wu, Wei Liu, Xiao Xiao, Yunshan Fan, Guangfei Gu, Shunzhi Yu, Huang Yan, Xiang Wang, Xifan Li, Yingchuan Zhao and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis after lumbar endoscopic single-segment decompression without fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xinbo Wu *Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Wei Liu *Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Xiao Xiao *Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Yunshan FanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Guangfei GuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Shunzhi YuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Huang YanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Nursing, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Xifan LiDepartment of Radiological, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Yingchuan ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Haijian NiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China.
Shisheng HeDepartment of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yanchang Road 301, Shanghai, 200072, People's Republic of China. tjhss7418@tongji.edu.cn.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82001927Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 22S31900100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis research aims to compare the clinical outcomes of VBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF for the treatment of patients with single-level degenerative lumbar diseases.

methodsNinety patients were enrolled in this study. The estimated blood loss, operation time, postoperative hospitalization days, time to functional exercise, amount of surgical drain and inflammatory index were recorded. The visual analog scale, Oswestry dysfunction index and modified MacNab criteria were used to assessed the patient's back and leg pain, functional status and clinical satisfaction rates.

resultsThe average operation time of the VBE-TLIF group was longer than that of the MIS-TLIF group. The time for functional exercise, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss and amount of surgical drain in the VBE-TLIF group were relative shorter than those in the MIS-TLIF group. Additionally, the levels of CRP, neutrophil, IL-6 and CPK in the VBE-TLIF group were significantly lower than those in the MIS-TLIF group at postoperative days 1 and 3, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients undergoing VBE-TLIF had significantly lower back VAS scores than those in the MIS-TLIF group on postoperative days 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the clinical satisfaction rates (95.83 vs. 95.24%, P = 0.458) or interbody fusion rate (97.92 vs. 95.24%, P = 0.730) between these two surgical procedures.

conclusionsBoth VBE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF are safe and effective surgical procedures for patients with lumbar diseases, but VBE-TLIF technique is a preferred surgical procedure with merits of reduced surgical trauma and quicker recovery.

Indexed as

Lumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionHumansLumbosacral RegionMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic spinal surgeryLumbar fusionMIS-TLIFVBE-TLIF

Identifiers

PMID38347273
OpenAlexW4391784534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.