Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347271›Full record

ArticleHistory and philosophy of the life sciences2024

Scrutinizing microbiome determinism: why deterministic hypotheses about the microbiome are conceptually ungrounded.

Javier Suárez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in History and philosophy of the life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Javier SuárezBIOETHICS Research Group - Department of Philosophy, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. Javier.suarez@uniovi.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-2277

Funding

Fundación BBVA SV-23-FBBVA-1Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2019/35/B/HS1/01998Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation PID2022-137993NA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper addresses the topic of determinism in contemporary microbiome research. I distinguish two types of deterministic claims about the microbiome, and I show evidence that both types of claims are present in the contemporary literature. First, the idea that the host genetics determines the composition of the microbiome which I call "host-microbiome determinism". Second, the idea that the genetics of the holobiont (the individual unit composed by a host plus its microbiome) determines the expression of certain phenotypic traits, which I call "microbiome-phenotype determinism". Drawing on the stability of traits conception of individuality (Suárez in Hist Philos Life Sci 42:11, 2020) I argue that none of these deterministic hypotheses is grounded on our current knowledge of how the holobiont is transgenerationally assembled, nor how it expresses its phenotypic traits.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMicrobiotaPhenotypeSymbiosisCausalityHologenomeMicrobiome heritabilityMicrobiotaPhylosymbiosisPostgenomic determinism

Identifiers

PMID38347271
PMCPMC10861753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.