Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347233›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2024

Comparison of remimazolam-based and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on hemodynamics during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial.

Taichi Kotani, Mitsuru Ida, Yusuke Naito, Masahiko Kawaguchi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Remimazolam in the perioperative setting: an answer in search of an ideal question.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  19. Reply to the letter.Journal of anesthesia · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taichi KotaniDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Shijo 840, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Mitsuru IdaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Shijo 840, Nara, 634-8522, Japan. nwnh0131@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-5285-257X
Yusuke NaitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Shijo 840, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Masahiko KawaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nara Medical University Kashihara, Shijo 840, Nara, 634-8522, Japan.
Nara Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

methodsThis was a single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial set at Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan. We included 36 patients aged ≥ 20 years scheduled to undergo elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under general anesthesia. The participants were randomly assigned to the remimazolam and propofol groups (n = 18 each). Remimazolam- or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia was initiated at 12 mg/kg/min or 2.5 mcg/mL via target-controlled infusion, respectively, along with remifentanil. After confirming the loss of consciousness, the administration rate was adjusted using electroencephalographic monitoring. The primary outcome was the rate of arterial hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure < 60 mmHg, from anesthesia induction until the beginning of the surgical incision. The total doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine were also assessed.

resultsDuring anesthesia induction, the arterial hypotension rates were 11.9% and 21.6% in the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.01). The total dose of ephedrine was higher in the propofol group (14.4 mg) than in the remimazolam group (1.6 mg) (P < 0.001); however, the total dose of phenylephrine was not significantly different between the two groups (propofol 0.31 mg vs. remimazolam: 0.17 mg, P = 0.10).

conclusionRemimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia resulted in a lower hypotension rate than propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia during induction in patients undergoing TAVR. Remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia can be used safely during anesthetic induction in patients with severe aortic stenosis.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, IntravenousAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesHemodynamicsPropofolTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansHypotensionMaleRemifentanilSingle-Blind MethodAnesthetics, IntravenousBenzodiazepinesPropofolRemifentanilAortic valve stenosisHemodynamicsPropofolRandomized controlled trialRemimazolam

Identifiers

PMID38347233
OpenAlexW4391757299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.