Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347220›Full record

ArticleArchives of women's mental health2024

Rural-urban differences in the perceived impact of COVID-19 on mental health by European women.

Mercedes Rodríguez, José A Camacho

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of women's mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19 in Rural Ontario Communities: Exploring Women's Mental Health During a Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. The impact of the COVID- 19 pandemic on women's mental health: empirical evidence from Vietnam.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mercedes RodríguezInstitute of Regional Development, University of Granada, Calle Rector López Argüeta. Edificio Centro de Documentación Científica, 3ª Planta, 18071, Granada, Spain. m_rodrig@ugr.es.ORCID 0000-0002-0524-7737
José A CamachoInstitute of Regional Development, University of Granada, Calle Rector López Argüeta. Edificio Centro de Documentación Científica, 3ª Planta, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

European Regional Development Fund B-HUM-460-UGR20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany studies have documented an adverse impact of the pandemic on women´s mental health. This cross-sectional study aims to explore associations between women's perceived impact of lockdowns and curfews on their mental health and their residential location, along with other contextual and individual factors.

methodsUsing data from the Flash Eurobarometer 2712 "Women in times of COVID-19", conducted between January 25 and February 3, 2022, across the 27 Member States of the European Union (n = 23,671), this study applied bivariate tests and stratified models based on respondent location (rural areas, small or medium-sized towns and urban areas). The exploration sought predictors influencing the perceived mental health impact, encompassing five individual characteristics (age, disability, employment status, educational attainment, and household type), perceptions of violence against women, and country of residence. The dependent variable was assessed subjectively, measured on a scale from 1 (minor negative impact) to 5 (major negative impact).

resultsWomen living in urban areas generally reported a higher perceived negative impact on mental health compared to women in rural areas or in small/medium-sized towns. Age and disability were significantly linked to perceiving a negative impact on mental health. Similar adjusted odds ratios for age were observed across rural areas (aOR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97-0.98), small or medium-sized towns (aOR 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.98), and urban areas (aOR 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97-0.98). In terms of disability, the odds were higher in rural areas (aOR 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20-1.73) than in urban ones (aOR 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15-1.62). Among women residing in urban areas, those in childless couples were less likely to perceive a negative impact on mental health (aOR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99) compared to women in couples with children. Respondents perceiving increased violence against women due to COVID-19 were more likely to perceive a negative impact on mental health, with higher odds ratios in rural areas (aOR 1.56, 95% CI = 1.40-1.74) compared to urban areas (aOR 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17-1.41). Differences across countries were also found.

conclusionThe perceived impact of lockdowns and curfews on mental health exhibited variance between urban and rural areas. These disparities were influenced by individual characteristics such as age, disability, or household type, as well as the effects of COVID-19 on violence against women and contextual variables like country of residence.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental HealthRural PopulationSARS-CoV-2Urban PopulationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeEuropean UnionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsYoung AdultMental healthRuralUrbanWomen

Identifiers

PMID38347220
PMCPMC11230959
OpenAlexW4391784830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.