Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38347178›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2024

Economic evaluations in cataract surgery: a narrative review.

José Ginel, N Burguera, D Piñero, A Sáez-Martín, A Haro De Rosario, J Fernández

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

José GinelQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, 04120, Almería, Spain. joseginel@qvision.es.
N BurgueraQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, 04120, Almería, Spain.
D PiñeroDepartment of Optics, Pharmacology and Anatomy, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1546-4807
A Sáez-MartínDepartment of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almería, Spain.
A Haro De RosarioDepartment of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business Studies, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120, Almería, Spain.
J FernándezQvision, Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital, 04120, Almería, Spain.
University of Almería · ESUniversity of Alicante · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Economic evaluations are tools for assessing emerging technologies and a complement for decision-making in healthcare systems. However, this topic may not be familiar for doctors and academics, who may be confused when interpreting the results of studies using these tools. Cataract is a disease which has received special attention in healthcare systems due to its high incidence, the great impact that it could have on patients' quality of life, and the fact that it can be definitively solved in almost all cases through cataract surgery. Historically, economic evaluations in cataract surgery have been conducted for many purposes by simply assessing whether the surgery is cost-effective for specific questions related to the implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses, surgical techniques, optimizing assessments, preventing diseases or complications, etc. Moreover, although there are systematic reviews about cataract surgery and narrative reviews introducing the concept of economic evaluations, as far as we know, no previous study has been conducted that synthesizes and integrates evidence coming from both fields. Thus, the purpose of this narrative review is to introduce doctors and academics to economic evaluation tools, to describe how these have been historically applied to cataract surgery, and to provide special considerations for the correct interpretation of economic studies.

Indexed as

Cataract ExtractionCost-Benefit AnalysisCataractHealth Care CostsHumansQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38347178
PMCPMC11126667
OpenAlexW4391746204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.