ReviewNature methods2024
Metrics reloaded: recommendations for image analysis validation.
Review in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 252 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
252 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-powered renal pathology for glomerular disease classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted versus independent physician interpretation for bone fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology experimental · 2026Pooled it
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Application of artificial intelligence in esophageal surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Application of artificial intelligence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- In search of truth: evaluating concordance of AI-based anatomy segmentation models.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
- Fully automated diaphragm segmentation on routine 2D-cine and 3D thoracic MRI: multireader validation.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Automatic Generation of Liver Virtual Models With Artificial Intelligence: Application to Liver Resection Complexity Prediction.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based 3D forensic facial reconstruction: a volumetric morphological inference approach using a skull-conditioned U-Net.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Automated Recognition of Hepatocystic Anatomy During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Current Evidence, Clinical Readiness, and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Cross-fraction prior learning for scalable organ-at-risk segmentation in abdominal MR-guided radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of YOLOv8 and nnU-Net v2 based pipelines for sex and age estimation from maxillary sinus morphometry on panoramic radiographs.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond benchmarking: an expert-guided consensus approach to spatially aware clustering.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Predicting brain tumour enhancement from non-contrast MRI with artificial intelligence: a multicohort, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study.The Lancet medical imaging & theranostics · 2026Article
- OrgLine: A versatile pipeline for organoid morphometry using detector-guided prompts.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Mel-DEPTHS: a benchmark dataset for epidermis and tumor segmentation for melanoma staging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Do not smile when acquiring consumer selfies for multi-attribute skin profiling and baseline deep learning evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Benchmarking Deep Learning for NSCLC PET/CT Segmentation on a Histologically Confirmed Vietnamese Dataset: Validation and Generalization.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Localization on Cervical Non-contrast CT: A Multicenter Validation and Two-Reader Pilot Study of a Standalone Executable nnU-Net Software.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
73 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing evidence shows that flaws in machine learning (ML) algorithm validation are an underestimated global problem. In biomedical image analysis, chosen performance metrics often do not reflect the domain interest, and thus fail to adequately measure scientific progress and hinder translation of ML techniques into practice. To overcome this, we created Metrics Reloaded, a comprehensive framework guiding researchers in the problem-aware selection of metrics. Developed by a large international consortium in a multistage Delphi process, it is based on the novel concept of a problem fingerprint-a structured representation of the given problem that captures all aspects that are relevant for metric selection, from the domain interest to the properties of the target structure(s), dataset and algorithm output. On the basis of the problem fingerprint, users are guided through the process of choosing and applying appropriate validation metrics while being made aware of potential pitfalls. Metrics Reloaded targets image analysis problems that can be interpreted as classification tasks at image, object or pixel level, namely image-level classification, object detection, semantic segmentation and instance segmentation tasks. To improve the user experience, we implemented the framework in the Metrics Reloaded online tool. Following the convergence of ML methodology across application domains, Metrics Reloaded fosters the convergence of validation methodology. Its applicability is demonstrated for various biomedical use cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.