ReviewNature methods2024
Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation.
Review in Nature methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- Deep learning for MRI-based acute and subacute ischaemic stroke lesion segmentation-a systematic review, meta-analysis, and pilot evaluation of key results.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Pooled it
- Feasibility of Deep Learning Segmentation in Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Ultrasound Imaging: Challenges in Identifying the Injection Plane.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- TOPOS: target organ prediction on scout views for automated CT scan planning.European radiology · 2026Article
- Quantifying the Resolution Ceiling of Prototype-Based Few-Shot Segmentation on Sub-Centimetre Pulmonary Nodules: A Training-Free Geometric Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ethical and Legal Concerns of Deepfake Technology in Biomedical Imaging: A Comprehensive Survey.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Toward trustworthy healthcare AI: designing academic research for translation readiness.Molecular systems biology · 2026Review
- Knowledge and Awareness of Performance Metrics in Dental Image Analysis With Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Researchers and Clinicians.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Language-Guided Segmentation of Medical Images: A Review of Foundation Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Quantifying cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis MRI datasets using multi-contrast post-processing and deep learning.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Risk and liability in the deployment of AI systems for surgery: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Uncertainty quantification of U-Net based segmentation tool using conformal prediction.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Regulating digital surgery to balance safety and innovation: a SAGES white paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Automatic lesion segmentation in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT and ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA SPECT/CT: added value of PET-guided SPECT in a bicentric study.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning to support delineation of neuro-oncology organs based on the EPTN international neurological contouring atlas.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- PIGMENT: A deep learning framework for Porcine Immunohistochemistry seGMENTation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Super-resolution of periapical and bitewing digital radiographs using convolutional neural network.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A Generalized Deep Learning Pipeline for Stain-Invariant Ultrastructural Segmentation in Peripheral Nerves.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Markerless 3D ultrasound reconstruction for augmented reality assisted minimally invasive spine surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Development of Human Conjunctival Goblet Cell Segmentation Datasets to Improve Quantitation.Scientific data · 2026Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
70 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Validation metrics are key for tracking scientific progress and bridging the current chasm between artificial intelligence research and its translation into practice. However, increasing evidence shows that, particularly in image analysis, metrics are often chosen inadequately. Although taking into account the individual strengths, weaknesses and limitations of validation metrics is a critical prerequisite to making educated choices, the relevant knowledge is currently scattered and poorly accessible to individual researchers. Based on a multistage Delphi process conducted by a multidisciplinary expert consortium as well as extensive community feedback, the present work provides a reliable and comprehensive common point of access to information on pitfalls related to validation metrics in image analysis. Although focused on biomedical image analysis, the addressed pitfalls generalize across application domains and are categorized according to a newly created, domain-agnostic taxonomy. The work serves to enhance global comprehension of a key topic in image analysis validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.